Should all smokers be taken out and shot?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Your Photos On Canvas High Quality Low Price From £15
Next: Perspective (was Re: Has ultrawide angle become an overused cliche?)
From: Allen on 9 Aug 2010 13:05 GregS wrote: <snip> > > Most all houses have mold. > > greg Did you mean moldING? Allen
From: N on 9 Aug 2010 17:20 "Outing Trolls is FUN!" <otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote in message news:v3uv565ks92m91tb6e4o8e83e6amvmjsnn(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> wrote: > >> >>"Outing Trolls is FUN!" <otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote in message >>news:9ttv561l6b1kvdkhcsolq0j3apccnna62h(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating. >>> >>> In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement? >>> >> >>Have you ever sold a house? > > Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred > remains and land if I want. > > Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?" > Yes, you could sell the remains, but if you sell a house on land but burn it before settlement, then you will have committed a crime and you will not be able to deliver on the sale. In Australia a product sold must be fit for the purpose for which it is sold. A lens such as the one Rich "picked up", if he paid for it, would fail the "fit for the purpose" test. -- N
From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on 9 Aug 2010 17:39 On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:20:34 +1000, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> wrote: > >"Outing Trolls is FUN!" <otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote in message >news:v3uv565ks92m91tb6e4o8e83e6amvmjsnn(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:44:57 +1000, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Outing Trolls is FUN!" <otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote in message >>>news:9ttv561l6b1kvdkhcsolq0j3apccnna62h(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:41:15 +1000, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>If you sell your house, you are required to clean it when vacating. >>>> >>>> In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement? >>>> >>> >>>Have you ever sold a house? >> >> Yes. And I could even burn them to the ground first and sell the charred >> remains and land if I want. >> >> Like I asked, "In what Nazi dictatorship country is that a requirement?" >> > >Yes, you could sell the remains, but if you sell a house on land but burn it >before settlement, then you will have committed a crime and you will not be >able to deliver on the sale. > Can't you even read, troll? I said I could burn it to the ground FIRST, and then sell the charred remains. If someone was so inclined to want to buy the charred remains that's their choice. BTW: I never buy a home where the home is the only value. The land has to be worth at least three times the cost of the home by itself. So even if the house does burn to the ground the sale is still worth more than the original price of the home. The value of the land on my most favorite home has now quadrupled in just eight years. The house could fly away in a tornado and the property would still be worth more than four times the original selling price. A home must have acreage, and lots of it. The mailbox at the end of the driveway is over three football fields away from the front door, and the house is near the front of the property, just to give you an idea. Enjoying your mommy's urban basement much? Try trolling someone else in an attempt to fill that desperate need for attention that you have.
From: Robert Haar on 9 Aug 2010 18:48 On 8/9/10 7:17 AM, "gamer_reg(a)yahoo.com" <gamer_reg(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:56:34 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> How can anyone do this to a camera? > > How you ask? > > Because it's THEIR camera. > > They bought and paid for it and how they use and treat it is their > choice just as how you use and treat your camera is your choice. > > Do you have a problem with free choice? No. Do you have a problem with honesty? If the previous owner chooses to smoke, that is his free choice. But if he sells it, the hidden defect of the accumulated smoke exposure should be revealed. Otherwise he is misleading prospective buyers.
From: Rich on 9 Aug 2010 18:59
tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in news:t93066te8cv2q03bcsuo7uvskvl75fmtbp(a)4ax.com: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 06:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>On Aug 8, 11:07�pm, ray <r...(a)zianet.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:45:52 -0700, RichA wrote: >>> >>> Caveat Emptor. >> >>You can't if you aren't told. > > The whole concept of "caveat emptor" is that you should not expect to > be told. That's why you should beware. > > In other words, never buy anything sight unseen or only from sources you know won't burn you. But since you can't buy anything sight unseen in the beginning how can you ever trust anyone to be able to buy? For me, no problem in most cases as I live near stores that carry a lot of photographic equipment. But for someone who is looking for something not readily available locally, they need the seller to be upfront about the condition of a product. |