Things are getting a bit spotty with the 500/4 Nikkor!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Paul Furman on 2 Aug 2010 01:36 Superzooms Still Win wrote: > perfectly representing the true scene Only for a creature with eyes a quarter inch apart.
From: Superzooms Still Win on 2 Aug 2010 01:43 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:20:13 -0700, Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote: >Superzooms Still Win wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't get out much into the real world. That much is more than clear. >>>>> >>>>> You're right. I don't take an afternoon drive, stop to take a >>>>> snapshot of a waterfall from the roadside, then claim it was some work >>>>> of art taken after a 14 day trek in the wilderness. >>>>> >>>>> No, I don't do that at all. ;-) >>>> >>>> Doesn't matter what you believe. I know I wasn't on any road or in any >>>> vehicle when I shot that photo. But why is it that in all other images of >>>> those falls posted on the net that you can't see the east wall of the falls >>>> but in my photo it is clearly seen and makes the falls look so much better? >>> >>> like this? >>> http://img43.imageshack.us/i/pbasetjodtrollmarthafal.jpg/ >> >> COOL! You found one of the people that stole some of the images from my >> original web-pages. THANKS! > >Yeah? http://www.pbase.com/tjod/image/45883509 > >> But the one on the left still doesn't show the image being taken from the >> same location and angle. If you look at the strata in the rock structure on >> that east wall, you can easily tell that mine was taken from a much lower >> and further west vantage point than all motor-tourists shoot from. > >Wow, you're right, these are very different: >http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/6982/verifypbasetjodtrollmar.jpg >And that tree on the left is so different. That's right, darken the images so much that nobody can see that your lines didn't follow the strata in the rocks. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a fuckin' troll you are. You're so much better at this than you are at any kind of photography, that's for damn sure. LOL!
From: Paul Furman on 2 Aug 2010 02:09 Superzooms Still Win wrote: > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:20:13 -0700, Paul Furman<paul-@-edgehill.net> > wrote: > >> Superzooms Still Win wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't get out much into the real world. That much is more than clear. >>>>>> >>>>>> You're right. I don't take an afternoon drive, stop to take a >>>>>> snapshot of a waterfall from the roadside, then claim it was some work >>>>>> of art taken after a 14 day trek in the wilderness. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, I don't do that at all. ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Doesn't matter what you believe. I know I wasn't on any road or in any >>>>> vehicle when I shot that photo. But why is it that in all other images of >>>>> those falls posted on the net that you can't see the east wall of the falls >>>>> but in my photo it is clearly seen and makes the falls look so much better? >>>> >>>> like this? >>>> http://img43.imageshack.us/i/pbasetjodtrollmarthafal.jpg/ >>> >>> COOL! You found one of the people that stole some of the images from my >>> original web-pages. THANKS! >> >> Yeah? http://www.pbase.com/tjod/image/45883509 >> >>> But the one on the left still doesn't show the image being taken from the >>> same location and angle. If you look at the strata in the rock structure on >>> that east wall, you can easily tell that mine was taken from a much lower >>> and further west vantage point than all motor-tourists shoot from. >> >> Wow, you're right, these are very different: >> http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/6982/verifypbasetjodtrollmar.jpg >> And that tree on the left is so different. > > That's right, darken the images so much that nobody can see that your lines > didn't follow the strata in the rocks. Like this? http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/7369/verify2pbasetjodtrollma.jpg > LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > What a fuckin' troll you are. You're so much better at this than you are at > any kind of photography, that's for damn sure. > > LOL! >
From: Superzooms Still Win on 2 Aug 2010 02:10 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:31:04 -0700, Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote: > >Shallow DOF could have saved this one. It would allow you to see through >the grass with wider angle rays, it can look a little from left & right, >making the foreground dissolve. >http://www.singita.com/images/galleries/lion_grass_large.jpg Now imagine from a viewer's perspective, even one who might be familiar with lion behavior, if they saw an image where you could barely tell that a lion was only 20 feet from you but was unmistakable if you looked intently. And on peering even more intently, noticed it was looking right at YOU. The face alone says nothing, it has been removed from the natural environment, destroying any emotional impact an image like that COULD have had, if the idiot photographer wasn't so proud of how blurry he can make all his images. Whoopie-do, it's a another lion's face. Like we haven't seen that before in any tourists' crapshots. Catching on yet? No, of course not. You know NOTHING about the art of photography, nor will you ever. You're a tech-head, gear-head, troll-head. Nothing more.
From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on 2 Aug 2010 02:18
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:09:25 -0700, Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote: >Superzooms Still Win wrote: >> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:20:13 -0700, Paul Furman<paul-@-edgehill.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Superzooms Still Win wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't get out much into the real world. That much is more than clear. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're right. I don't take an afternoon drive, stop to take a >>>>>>> snapshot of a waterfall from the roadside, then claim it was some work >>>>>>> of art taken after a 14 day trek in the wilderness. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, I don't do that at all. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Doesn't matter what you believe. I know I wasn't on any road or in any >>>>>> vehicle when I shot that photo. But why is it that in all other images of >>>>>> those falls posted on the net that you can't see the east wall of the falls >>>>>> but in my photo it is clearly seen and makes the falls look so much better? >>>>> >>>>> like this? >>>>> http://img43.imageshack.us/i/pbasetjodtrollmarthafal.jpg/ >>>> >>>> COOL! You found one of the people that stole some of the images from my >>>> original web-pages. THANKS! >>> >>> Yeah? http://www.pbase.com/tjod/image/45883509 >>> >>>> But the one on the left still doesn't show the image being taken from the >>>> same location and angle. If you look at the strata in the rock structure on >>>> that east wall, you can easily tell that mine was taken from a much lower >>>> and further west vantage point than all motor-tourists shoot from. >>> >>> Wow, you're right, these are very different: >>> http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/6982/verifypbasetjodtrollmar.jpg >>> And that tree on the left is so different. >> >> That's right, darken the images so much that nobody can see that your lines >> didn't follow the strata in the rocks. > >Like this? >http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/7369/verify2pbasetjodtrollma.jpg > BWAHHAHAHAA!!!!! You didn't even follow the strata in each image. Try again. LOL! But thanks for posting that one. I'll definitely save it to show everyone just how skewed your original lines were and are, as proof for what a lame troll you are. You're not even good at that. I guess along with photography you'll have to give up your career at trolling too. LOL!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laughs, TROLL! Too too fuckin' funny! LOL! |