From: Karl E. Peterson on
on 6/11/2010, Paul Clement supposed :
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:36:17 -0400, "Mayayana" <mayayana(a)invalid.nospam>
> wrote:
>
> � What's that? You mean the forums have ads and
> � the ad server is setting a cookie? That's a new
> � low, if Microsoft is selling ads on their own website.
> �
> � I don't allow cookies and block 3rd-party images,
> � as well as using a HOSTS file, so I wasn't aware
> � of any ads.
> �
>
> Neither is he. There are no ads.

HA! Every user gets to craft whatever sig they want, include imagery.
They're openly inviting abuse with that. <eg>

I suppose it's semantics to argue whether their own logos are branding
or advertising. Not sure that's a distinction that makes a difference?


From: Paul Clement on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:22:40 -0700, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:

� > � I don't allow cookies and block 3rd-party images,
� > � as well as using a HOSTS file, so I wasn't aware
� > � of any ads.
� > �
� >
� > Neither is he. There are no ads.

� HA! Every user gets to craft whatever sig they want, include imagery.
� They're openly inviting abuse with that. <eg>

Now, what sort of individual would do such a thing? ;-)

� I suppose it's semantics to argue whether their own logos are branding
� or advertising. Not sure that's a distinction that makes a difference?


I don't think you will find many software vendor web sites that don't have links to their own
product pages.


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Karl E. Peterson on
Paul Clement explained :
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:22:40 -0700, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:
>
> � > � I don't allow cookies and block 3rd-party images,
> � > � as well as using a HOSTS file, so I wasn't aware
> � > � of any ads.
> � > �
> � >
> � > Neither is he. There are no ads.
> �
> � HA! Every user gets to craft whatever sig they want, include imagery.
> � They're openly inviting abuse with that. <eg>
>
> Now, what sort of individual would do such a thing? ;-)

Hard to imagine, but where there's a way... <g>

> � I suppose it's semantics to argue whether their own logos are branding
> � or advertising. Not sure that's a distinction that makes a difference?
>
> I don't think you will find many software vendor web sites that don't have
> links to their own product pages.

Nice you made the distinction there between "vendor" sites and "user
support communities."


From: Paul Clement on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:24:08 -0700, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:


� > � I suppose it's semantics to argue whether their own logos are branding
� > � or advertising. Not sure that's a distinction that makes a difference?
� >
� > I don't think you will find many software vendor web sites that don't have
� > links to their own product pages.

� Nice you made the distinction there between "vendor" sites and "user
� support communities."


Well, yeah. The webified "user support communities" generally have several third-party ads rolling.


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Karl E. Peterson on
Paul Clement pretended :
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:24:08 -0700, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote:
>
> �
> � > � I suppose it's semantics to argue whether their own logos are branding
> � > � or advertising. Not sure that's a distinction that makes a difference?
> � >
> � > I don't think you will find many software vendor web sites that don't
> have � > links to their own product pages.
> �
> � Nice you made the distinction there between "vendor" sites and "user
> � support communities."
> �
>
> Well, yeah. The webified "user support communities" generally have several
> third-party ads rolling.

Unlike here, thankfully.