Why only 4.6MP?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Processing Program
Next: curanzia versicherung, berufsunf�higkeits versicherung, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung f�r selbst�ndige, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
From: nospam on 1 Mar 2010 14:57 In article <MPG.25f6355616ffd29c98c246(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > I would actually be interested to see if the Foveon can beat the 8Mpixel > > clasic Bayer CCD. > > Quite unlikely with just 4.6MP. since it can't beat 8 mp, it certainly can't beat 12-15 mp, nevermind 21-24 mp.
From: nospam on 1 Mar 2010 14:57 In article <MPG.25f6345cbba18d1698c244(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > These resolution tests are rather meaningless, because they were > performed with black and white test targets. as mentioned numerous times before, that's what matters to human vision. ask your eye doctor why the eye charts are b/w.
From: David J Taylor on 1 Mar 2010 15:47 "Alfred Molon" <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.25f6335f3d8f311f98c243(a)news.supernews.com... [] > Did you even read what I wrote? Your reply has no connection at all with > my post. > -- > > Alfred Molon Yes, and I thought what you said was incorrect. A full-colour sensor with the same number of pixels as a Bayer sensor will have a greater resolution, and therefore place /more/ demands on the lenses. The Bayer sensor should have a low-pass filter with a lower cut-off frequency. Cheers, David
From: David J Taylor on 1 Mar 2010 15:49 "Bruce" <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:si5oo51mpj4arb0nffapr2f8q6ci08vfd7(a)4ax.com... [] > David likes the sound of his own voice. He purports to have some > detailed high level knowledge of the workings of digital sensors. > > However, his only relevant experience was gained using a low-end Nikon > DSLR and a consumer grade zoom lens. As a result, his signal/noise > ratio is very low indeed, approximating to that of an average wasp. Lost the argument again, if all you can produce are personal attacks, and that you can afford better equipment than I can. David
From: Bruce on 1 Mar 2010 16:10
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:49:07 -0000, "David J Taylor" <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >"Bruce" <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:si5oo51mpj4arb0nffapr2f8q6ci08vfd7(a)4ax.com... >[] >> David likes the sound of his own voice. He purports to have some >> detailed high level knowledge of the workings of digital sensors. >> >> However, his only relevant experience was gained using a low-end Nikon >> DSLR and a consumer grade zoom lens. As a result, his signal/noise >> ratio is very low indeed, approximating to that of an average wasp. > >Lost the argument again, if all you can produce are personal attacks, and >that you can afford better equipment than I can. I need better equipment than you. This is my job, not my hobby. Sorry if that upsets you. |