From: Sandra Kachelmann on
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Sandra Kachelmann
> <s.kachelmann(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Sandra Kachelmann <s.kachelmann(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Schweizer
>>> > <schweizer.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hello Sandra
>>> >>
>>> >> I was in a similar situation. I found the following paramters very usefull:
>>> >>
>>> >> portmaster -a -d --no-confirm
>>> >>
>>> >> -a: Take all installed ports
>>> >> -d: Delete any dependicies
>>> >> -no--confirm: Wait not after the check which ports are upgradable
>
>> and like someone else suggested adding BATCH?=yes to /etc/make.conf,
>> then running:
>>
>> $ portmaster -a -d --no-confirm
>>
>> Still asks me to confirm all the options.
>
> If you absolutely do not want to see the OPTIONS screens, no matter
> what, then add -G (see man page for details).

I tried that but if i run

$ portmaster --no-confirm -G /usr/ports/x11/xorg

The libiconv OPTIONS dialog pops up.

Sandra
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Sandra Kachelmann on
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Adam Vande More <amvandemore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you absolutely do not want to see the OPTIONS screens, no matter
>> what, then add -G (see man page for details).
>
> No, that's not what -G does.  -G makes portmaster handle the options screen
> similar to portupgrade eg waiting to ask you until it runs into it.
>
> Setting BATCH=yes in make.conf does work, maybe BATCH?=yes breaks it, my
> make.conf fu is only sightly better than it documentation which isn't much.
>
> --
> Adam Vande More

OK, that does work:

Setting BATCH=yes in /etc/make.conf and running:

$ portmaster --no-confirm -G /usr/ports/x11/xorg

But is there really no way to specify it as argument of portmaster?

Sandra
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Sandra Kachelmann on
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sandra Kachelmann
<s.kachelmann(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Adam Vande More <amvandemore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you absolutely do not want to see the OPTIONS screens, no matter
>>> what, then add -G (see man page for details).
>>
>> No, that's not what -G does.  -G makes portmaster handle the options screen
>> similar to portupgrade eg waiting to ask you until it runs into it.
>>
>> Setting BATCH=yes in make.conf does work, maybe BATCH?=yes breaks it, my
>> make.conf fu is only sightly better than it documentation which isn't much.
>>
>> --
>> Adam Vande More
>
> OK, that does work:
>
> Setting BATCH=yes in /etc/make.conf and running:
>
> $ portmaster --no-confirm -G /usr/ports/x11/xorg
>
> But is there really no way to specify it as argument of portmaster?
>
> Sandra

Think I found it:

portmaster --no-confirm -G -m 'BATCH=yes' /usr/ports/x11/xorg

This seems to do what I want. Still --batch would be nice - guess I'll
create a shell alias.

Sorry for all the lame questions - it seems that I want something
really special nobody else is interested in.

Sandra
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Matthias Andree on
Am 06.08.2010 15:59, schrieb Sandra Kachelmann:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Adam Vande More <amvandemore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you absolutely do not want to see the OPTIONS screens, no matter
>>> what, then add -G (see man page for details).
>>
>> No, that's not what -G does. -G makes portmaster handle the options screen
>> similar to portupgrade eg waiting to ask you until it runs into it.
>>
>> Setting BATCH=yes in make.conf does work, maybe BATCH?=yes breaks it, my
>> make.conf fu is only sightly better than it documentation which isn't much.
>>
>> --
>> Adam Vande More
>
> OK, that does work:
>
> Setting BATCH=yes in /etc/make.conf and running:
>
> $ portmaster --no-confirm -G /usr/ports/x11/xorg
>
> But is there really no way to specify it as argument of portmaster?

Did you try this? portmaster ... -mBATCH=yes ...

--
Matthias Andree
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Adam Vande More on
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> If you absolutely do not want to see the OPTIONS screens, no matter
> what, then add -G (see man page for details).
>

No, that's not what -G does. -G makes portmaster handle the options screen
similar to portupgrade eg waiting to ask you until it runs into it.

Setting BATCH=yes in make.conf does work, maybe BATCH?=yes breaks it, my
make.conf fu is only sightly better than it documentation which isn't much.

--
Adam Vande More
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"