Avast Doesn't Block XP Defender malware (ave.exe)
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: Leythos on 9 Apr 2010 08:27 In article <huWdne3s0MtwUiPWnZ2dnUVZ8hSdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.ukk says... > In the UK a red light at traffic lights means 'stop'. In parts of the > USA I believe a red light allows one to "turn right on a red" - have > *you* ever done that, Leythos? I found it felt good to do that! :) > So, you follow the rules of the location you're in, so why not follow the rules in Usenet? Oh, that's right, you're above rules that you don't want to follow. Thanks for proving what everyone thinks. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: ~BD~ on 9 Apr 2010 08:57 FromTheRafters wrote: > "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in message > news:HPSdnbTOC7tNbCPWnZ2dnUVZ7v-dnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> katee sackhoff wrote: >>> Yes I am. >>> >>> >> Proof positive that you may *not* be trusted! >> >> There is no mention of computing in her Biography, here: >> >> http://www.after-darkness.com/showthread.php?t=7382 >> >> Your vanity would have demanded that computer skills /were/ mentioned! >> >> Bad guys *always* make mistakes. This was yours. > > Are you sure those posts weren't forgeries? > > Alas, *no* - I'm not sure about anything at all on-line! ;-) To be honest, I didn't even think to look at the posting properties. -- Dave
From: ~BD~ on 9 Apr 2010 09:14 Leythos wrote: > In article<huWdne3s0MtwUiPWnZ2dnUVZ8hSdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, > BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.ukk says... >> In the UK a red light at traffic lights means 'stop'. In parts of the >> USA I believe a red light allows one to "turn right on a red" - have >> *you* ever done that, Leythos? I found it felt good to do that! :) >> > > So, you follow the rules of the location you're in, so why not follow > the rules in Usenet? Oh, that's right, you're above rules that you don't > want to follow. > > Thanks for proving what everyone thinks. > You failed to mention ..... "Rules are for the obeyance of fools and the guidance of wise men" Did you even make it to *Petty* Officer, Leythos? -- Dave
From: ~BD~ on 9 Apr 2010 09:16 Leythos wrote: > In article<hpm4ol$g26$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday says... >> I go with the flow. Most people complain about the rules to others while >> they don't follow the rules themselves. I'm at the stage in my life now >> where I'm pretty comfy with who I am, and I've earned the right to do as I >> please, which doesn't really include doing anything harmful. As far as I >> can tell, posting something that someone might take offense to because it >> could be considered *off-topic* means nothing in the grand scheme of life, >> or even ngs. Next week the topic and complaints will move on to the flavor >> of the day. >> > > That's what I thought you would say, you're going to do what you want, > ignoring any rules or guidlines, because YOU want to and you believe > you're more important than what came before you. > Jenn is now an important person in *my* life, but she wasn't last year. Things change - and you should too! :) -- Dave
From: Whoever on 9 Apr 2010 10:47
"FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:hpmv0i$psl$1 @news.eternal-september.org: > "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in message > news:HPSdnbTOC7tNbCPWnZ2dnUVZ7v-dnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> katee sackhoff wrote: >>> Yes I am. >>> >>> >> Proof positive that you may *not* be trusted! >> >> There is no mention of computing in her Biography, here: >> >> http://www.after-darkness.com/showthread.php?t=7382 >> >> Your vanity would have demanded that computer skills /were/ mentioned! >> >> Bad guys *always* make mistakes. This was yours. > > Are you sure those posts weren't forgeries? While I can't speak for the PCButts/katee sackhoff posts (though their headers all seem to match PCButts' other postings), I'm not quite sure why you would think my earlier posting might be a forgery? A forgery of whom? Another of Chris' sock puppets? To what end? If it really bothers you not to know who I am, I'll toss in my old .sig file here. I just redid this system and haven't bothered to redo my newsreader sig. Frankly, I'm really wondering why I bother to follow usenet any more. The S/N ratio has dropped so low that it's rarely worth the time any more. Force of habit I guess.... -- Rick Simon rsimon(a)cris.com Include "spam(trap)key" somewhere in the body of any email to avoid my spam filters. |