Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: OWLS is not equal to c
Next: Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation
From: George Dishman on 22 Jul 2005 18:13 "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message news:06cEe.24050$yP3.20410(a)fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > > "bz" <bz+sp(a)ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote in message > news:Xns969B89EC5D5A9WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote(a)130.39.198.139... > | "George Dishman" <george(a)briar.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:dbr8pg$miv$1 > | @news.freedom2surf.net: > > > Watch our for bz. He'll calculate 76.6c for the speed of > an electron in an accelerator and blame YOU for it. Well so far he has said nothing I disagree with and provided some very useful links in an area where my knowledge is decades out of date. As for "76.6c", I suspect that would be the Newtonian prediction. It certainly isn't relevant to our discussion, maybe you saw it in some other thread? George
From: bz on 22 Jul 2005 19:02 "George Dishman" <george(a)briar.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:dbrieo$q9g$1 @news.freedom2surf.net: > We are certainly on the verge of moving to > verge of handling single photons routinely. Yep > Thanks again for the links. quite welcome. I looked but I didn't see anything there that would tell me the pulse width [photon length?]. The spectra seem to indicate that the single photons have very narrow bandwidth [as I would expect]. -- bz please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an infinite set. bz+sp(a)ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
From: Aristotle on 22 Jul 2005 20:00 >> >>And you still REFUSE to answer the question. Are you a politician? >>You sure duck questions like one. > >I have answered Andersen's question so many times that he has even forgotten >what the question was. > >Notice that he and his mates have run for cover over my proof that the mythical >'GR correction' of GPS clocks if plain nonsense from start to finish. Consistent and a pair of cajones. No only do you still duck the questions you accuse others of doing it as well.
From: George Dishman on 23 Jul 2005 04:41 "Aristotle" <wandering_philosopher(a)socratic_discipline.org> wrote in message news:q123e1p7a4c3pfa0590b22ac5bokg0kelb(a)4ax.com... > >>> >>>And you still REFUSE to answer the question. Are you a politician? >>>You sure duck questions like one. >> >>I have answered Andersen's question so many times that he has even >>forgotten >>what the question was. >> >>Notice that he and his mates have run for cover over my proof that the >>mythical >>'GR correction' of GPS clocks if plain nonsense from start to finish. > > > Consistent and a pair of cajones. > No only do you still duck the questions you accuse others of doing it > as well. Nor is it even true, I am still pointing out the obvious error in his post and will continue to do so. On the other hand, Henri said: "Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message news:vra0e1l2dnmc55eu4h5185co82auufal1l(a)4ax.com... .... > George, I am not interested in discucssing > the sagna c any more. George
From: Aristotle on 23 Jul 2005 18:13
>>>Notice that he and his mates have run for cover over my proof that the >>>mythical >>>'GR correction' of GPS clocks if plain nonsense from start to finish. >> >> >> Consistent and a pair of cajones. >> No only do you still duck the questions you accuse others of doing it >> as well. > >Nor is it even true, I am still pointing out the >obvious error in his post and will continue to >do so. On the other hand, Henri said: > >"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message >news:vra0e1l2dnmc55eu4h5185co82auufal1l(a)4ax.com... >... >> George, I am not interested in discucssing >> the sagna c any more. > >George I have long given up any hope of hearing Henri speak the truth. |