From: Steen Schmidt on
Yao Konan wrote:

> *(seq(seq(1/(sqrt(2*i+1)+I*sqrt(2*j+1)),i,1,4),j,1,4))^-1

On a TI92/89 there's no difference between i and I.

Regards
Steen
From: Steen Schmidt on
Veli-Pekka Nousiainen wrote:

> > > But in UserRPL the recursive Fibonacci formula traverses to
> > > FIBNUM(1000) in 4 seconds on a HP50G.
>
> Recursive?
> You mean a loop...

Sure, sorry.

> for the recursion you need a 50G in USB...
> oe an emulator on a PC

Why is that?

Regards
Steen
From: Veli-Pekka Nousiainen on
Steen Schmidt wrote:
> Veli-Pekka Nousiainen wrote:
>
>>>> But in UserRPL the recursive Fibonacci formula traverses to
>>>> FIBNUM(1000) in 4 seconds on a HP50G.
>>
>> Recursive?
>> You mean a loop...
>
> Sure, sorry.
>
>> for the recursion you need a 50G in USB...
>> oe an emulator on a PC
>
> Why is that?

batteries will run out before the answer gets there
;-)


From: Yao Konan on
I told in one of my previous post that I stands for the imaginary
number.

Regards,
Konan Yao

Steen Schmidt a écrit :

> Yao Konan wrote:
>
> > *(seq(seq(1/(sqrt(2*i+1)+I*sqrt(2*j+1)),i,1,4),j,1,4))^-1
>
> On a TI92/89 there's no difference between i and I.
>
> Regards
> Steen

From: Steen Schmidt on
Yao Konan wrote:

> I told in one of my previous post that I stands for the imaginary
> number.

Ok, sorry - couldn't find that, so I didn't look thoroughly enough :-)

Cheers,
Steen