Moonset Over Zion
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Peter on 23 Jul 2010 14:58 "GMAN" <Winniethepooh(a)100acrewoods.org> wrote in message news:Yuk2o.873794$FK3.471059(a)en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com... > In article <4c499fe1$0$5504$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter" > <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >>"M-M" <nospam.m-m(a)ny.more> wrote in message >>news:nospam.m-m-E71B21.09502223072010(a)cpe-76-190-186-198.neo.res.rr.com... >>> Taken inside Zion National Park from the bottom of the canyon. >>> >>> http://www.netaxs.com/~mhmyers/d80/DSC_23928w.jpg >>> >>> -- >>> m-m >>> http://www.mhmyers.com >> >> >> >>Interesting effect. I would have liked to see the silhouette sharp. The >>blurry outline ruins it for me. >> > None of you seem happy with anyones effort unless it was "YOU" who took > the > picture, then its a masterpiece. I enjoyed this photo, flaws or no flaws. That is neither a fair, nor true comment. With the exception of our resident troll, there have been many compliments and hopeful suggestions. Life is not a kindergarten and I am not related to the maker. If an image is submitted for critique and I am so inclined I will make what I hope are helpful suggestions. Just as when I submit an image in the SI, I hope to get honest comment. If you like the image, it would be helpful to all of us by saying why you like it. That too is helpful critique. -- Peter
From: me on 23 Jul 2010 16:26 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:56:50 -0400, "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >Interesting effect. I would have liked to see the silhouette sharp. The >blurry outline ruins it for me. How would you propose to have both the moon and the silhouette both be sharp in a single shot with 1000mm f.l.?
From: Peter on 23 Jul 2010 17:25 "me" <me(a)mine.net> wrote in message news:fluj465l2ti01muthbuq2b7clon73n3kkh(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:56:50 -0400, "Peter" > <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: > > >>Interesting effect. I would have liked to see the silhouette sharp. The >>blurry outline ruins it for me. > > > How would you propose to have both the moon and the silhouette both be > sharp in a single shot with 1000mm f.l.? The same way you take a picture of a hummingbird, with its wings frozen, with a 28mm f5.6 lens, without strobe. -- Peter
From: me on 23 Jul 2010 19:18 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:25:09 -0400, "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >"me" <me(a)mine.net> wrote in message >news:fluj465l2ti01muthbuq2b7clon73n3kkh(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:56:50 -0400, "Peter" >> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >> >> >>>Interesting effect. I would have liked to see the silhouette sharp. The >>>blurry outline ruins it for me. >> >> >> How would you propose to have both the moon and the silhouette both be >> sharp in a single shot with 1000mm f.l.? > > >The same way you take a picture of a hummingbird, with its wings frozen, >with a 28mm f5.6 lens, without strobe. I'm sorry, I must be dense. Can you please be more explicit?
From: George Kerby on 23 Jul 2010 20:38
On 7/23/10 3:26 PM, in article fluj465l2ti01muthbuq2b7clon73n3kkh(a)4ax.com, "me" <me(a)mine.net> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:56:50 -0400, "Peter" > <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: > > >> Interesting effect. I would have liked to see the silhouette sharp. The >> blurry outline ruins it for me. > > > How would you propose to have both the moon and the silhouette both be > sharp in a single shot with 1000mm f.l.? Careful planning. |