Non-Browser javascript Implementations - Rhino
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: Buy Sildenafil (Kamagra) online without script, online pharmacy Sildenafil (Kamagra) no prescription, buy Sildenafil (Kamagra) in Salt Lake City, buy cheap Sildenafil (Kamagra) online now
Next: Cursor in a textarea
From: Bwig Zomberi on 13 Apr 2010 00:36 Garrett Smith wrote: > "Non-Browser javascript Implementations". > [list] Can you simply say "JavaScript Engine for Java"? -- Bwig Zomberi
From: Garrett Smith on 13 Apr 2010 01:55 RobG wrote: > On Apr 13, 10:51 am, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> RobG wrote: [...] >> Javascript Library Groups (Google Groups) >> [list] > > Not sure that section is useful. Prototype.js is just about dead, the > jQuery forum has moved to a different site and there are a number of > other "popular" libraries whose discussion forums aren't listed. Might > be best to say "search for a relevant group". As in:- | No javascript libraries are endorsed by this group. If you are looking | for help using a library, visit that library's discussion group | instead. And just remove the links found at: <http://www.jibbering.com/faq/#libraryResources> ? The phrase "or ask in > clj" could be added if it is thought such requests will be answered > civilly. > I proposed quite some time ago something to the effect of: If you are interested in discussing the design of such libraries, c.l.js is the right place to do that. > If not, it will be counter-productive. > > >> "Non-Browser javascript Implementations". >> [list] >> >> It could also very well be titled: >> "Other ECMAScript Implementations" > > Perhaps just a section on ECMAScript implementations and some uses, > see my reply to your previous post. > I see it. What about splitting that section into two: | Other Environments | Developing Dashboard Widgets | <URL: http://developer.apple.com/macosx/dashboard.html> | Win32 Scripting, Using Scripting to Automate Windows | http://cwashington.netreach.net/ | Whitebeam Apache Module - Server Side JavaScript in Apache; | http://www.whitebeam.org/ | | Standalone ECMAScript Implementations | Rhino: an open-source implementation of JavaScript written in Java | <URL: http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/> | Digital Mars DMD Script, console and MS Active Script implementation | of ECMAScript | http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/ ? BTW - I have not used DMD script for "MS Active Script" and I don't see anything on the site about that. [...] > [...] >> I guess. Or could have a title: >> >> Other ECMAScript Implementations > > Or just "ECMAScript implementations" > But then it should seem to include browsers, which it doesn't. Browser documentation was covered in a previous list "Browser documentation". -- Garrett comp.lang.javascript FAQ: http://jibbering.com/faq/
From: Garrett Smith on 13 Apr 2010 02:14 Bwig Zomberi wrote: > Garrett Smith wrote: >> "Non-Browser javascript Implementations". >> [list] > > Can you simply say "JavaScript Engine for Java"? > I am thinking that DMD script could, with Rhino, go into a separate category. Please see my response to RobG on this thread. Come to think of it, Spidermonkey and V8 go there, too. <http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/> <http://code.google.com/p/v8/> -- Garrett comp.lang.javascript FAQ: http://jibbering.com/faq/
From: Bwig Zomberi on 13 Apr 2010 02:42 Garrett Smith wrote: > Bwig Zomberi wrote: >> Garrett Smith wrote: >>> "Non-Browser javascript Implementations". >>> [list] >> >> Can you simply say "JavaScript Engine for Java"? >> > I am thinking that DMD script could, with Rhino, go into a separate > category. Please see my response to RobG on this thread. Come to think > of it, Spidermonkey and V8 go there, too. > > <http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/> > <http://code.google.com/p/v8/> Correction: This would not be useful - "JavaScript Engine for Java" Only one candidate. You could have "JavaScript Engines Used In Browsers" and another one for "Other/Modular JavaScript Engines". Will you include BESEN? http://besen.sourceforge.net/ -- Bwig Zomberi
From: Sean Kinsey on 13 Apr 2010 03:20
On Apr 12, 9:12 am, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Rhino is a non-browser javascript implementation and it does not appear > in the FAQ resources under: > > Non-Browser javascript Implementations > > I think the link should be on the list: > <http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/> > -- > Garrett > comp.lang.javascript FAQ:http://jibbering.com/faq/ Why not use something along the lines of "Embeddable/console-based [run-time environments/Virtual Machines] for 'javascript'". I'm guessing the main point here is to list VM's available for use outside the browser right? |