Picking Lice With The 70-200 VR2!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Review sites DESPERATE for SOMETHING to test
Next: Amazon and Apple, two vile companies probed for price fixing
From: SneakyP on 4 Aug 2010 02:02 SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote in news:Xns9DCA6C8D961748umofa02sneakemailc(a)127.0.0.1: > Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in > news:2010080319223119336-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom: > > >> >> ...I do like nice things though, and most times they seem to be >> prohibitively expensive. >> > > I'd like to get my hands on a pair of RAAL tweets. Different hobby of > course, but it's just a $1,200 ribbon tweeter speaker with a sweetly > diffracted high-end. (or so it has been praised). > > OTOH, I want a lens that can produce the clarity that one seems to > show and it appears that it's going to cost about $1,000 to do that, > with the rest of the equipment being compatible too. > If Larry/Rita would be able to share what taking that kind of picture would involve in the equipment end, I'd appreciate the cost quote facts. -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do.
From: Savageduck on 4 Aug 2010 02:21 On 2010-08-03 23:02:47 -0700, SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> said: > SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote in > news:Xns9DCA6C8D961748umofa02sneakemailc(a)127.0.0.1: > >> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in >> news:2010080319223119336-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom: >> >> >>> >>> ...I do like nice things though, and most times they seem to be >>> prohibitively expensive. >>> >> >> I'd like to get my hands on a pair of RAAL tweets. Different hobby of >> course, but it's just a $1,200 ribbon tweeter speaker with a sweetly >> diffracted high-end. (or so it has been praised). >> >> OTOH, I want a lens that can produce the clarity that one seems to >> show and it appears that it's going to cost about $1,000 to do that, >> with the rest of the equipment being compatible too. >> > > If Larry/Rita would be able to share what taking that kind of picture > would involve in the equipment end, I'd appreciate the cost quote facts. Consider Larry/Rita has boasted of a camera armory of a D3x @ $7,400 + 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII @$2,179 for a camera lens combo of $9,579. Not chump change even if we tone back the D3x to a D3s @ $5,200 giving us a total of $7,379. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Superzooms Still Win on 4 Aug 2010 02:36 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:02:47 -0500, SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote: >SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote in >news:Xns9DCA6C8D961748umofa02sneakemailc(a)127.0.0.1: > >> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in >> news:2010080319223119336-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom: >> >> >>> >>> ...I do like nice things though, and most times they seem to be >>> prohibitively expensive. >>> >> >> I'd like to get my hands on a pair of RAAL tweets. Different hobby of >> course, but it's just a $1,200 ribbon tweeter speaker with a sweetly >> diffracted high-end. (or so it has been praised). >> >> OTOH, I want a lens that can produce the clarity that one seems to >> show and it appears that it's going to cost about $1,000 to do that, >> with the rest of the equipment being compatible too. >> > >If Larry/Rita would be able to share what taking that kind of picture >would involve in the equipment end, I'd appreciate the cost quote facts. It costs about $75 to $350 for any superzoom camera in the last 8-9 years to accomplish getting even better photos. <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4142/4858933159_611e8b1234_z.jpg>
From: Superzooms Still Win on 4 Aug 2010 03:20 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:36:27 -0500, Superzooms Still Win <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote: >On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:02:47 -0500, SneakyP ><48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote: > >>SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote in >>news:Xns9DCA6C8D961748umofa02sneakemailc(a)127.0.0.1: >> >>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in >>> news:2010080319223119336-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> ...I do like nice things though, and most times they seem to be >>>> prohibitively expensive. >>>> >>> >>> I'd like to get my hands on a pair of RAAL tweets. Different hobby of >>> course, but it's just a $1,200 ribbon tweeter speaker with a sweetly >>> diffracted high-end. (or so it has been praised). >>> >>> OTOH, I want a lens that can produce the clarity that one seems to >>> show and it appears that it's going to cost about $1,000 to do that, >>> with the rest of the equipment being compatible too. >>> >> >>If Larry/Rita would be able to share what taking that kind of picture >>would involve in the equipment end, I'd appreciate the cost quote facts. > >It costs about $75 to $350 for any superzoom camera in the last 8-9 years >to accomplish getting even better photos. > ><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4142/4858933159_611e8b1234_z.jpg> Damn, silly me. I forgot, that you pixel obsessed (vs. worthwhile content obsessed) DSLR-TROLLS, gear-heads, twits, and other assorted wastes-of-flesh need to see a full resolution crop. Here's the threads in the jeans. <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4139/4859015281_a8ec4bd905_m.jpg>
From: Stuffed Crust on 4 Aug 2010 08:09
In rec.photo.equipment.35mm tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > intersections with thousands of dollars worth of sound equipment > blaring out rap "music" so loudly that my door panel shakes. They > have more money in their rims and wheels than my car costs. Once, just once, I came across a car blasting out Beethoven. It made my evening. :) - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org Melbourne, FL ^^ (mail/jabber/gtalk) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. |