Relativity

Relativity Error
"If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which ha... 30 Jun 2010 08:41

Symmetry of BP's economic blowout & scarcity of their product?
hey, I resemble that remark -- except that I almost never agrievously insist that such a figure as herr-doktor professer Albert is not even wrong in all or most respects. no; so, check-out _Einstein's Mistakes_, a recent hardcover, which is not anti-Albert in the least, and really does give the gist of his modu... 24 Jun 2010 19:43

Doctrine of need
On Jun 24, 10:42 pm, stevendaryl3...(a)yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) wrote: Unless you have such an experiment, we must always consider the possibility that whatever coordinate system we are using happens to be the bogus one. So, for practical purposes, we need a physics that tells how things lo... 24 Jun 2010 18:36

Arrow of Time II
On Jun 21, 4:26 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: If you don't believe me, just try to resolve the issue I brought up earlier using any of those theories: what is the "cause" of the fire on this match? ---------------------------------------------------------------... 28 Jun 2010 21:40

Inertia still lying for Einstein
colp wrote: [...] Those who are too stupid to learn SR shouldn't be posting here. ... 25 Jun 2010 03:21

dood, why did BP use the phrase "fossilized fuel TM" with a cartoon dinosaur-into-a-drop-of-oil?
surely it could not be so hard, to find some of the rather definitive un-null results of Michelson, Morely et al; is it?... well, even as Albert the Witnit wobbled on the idea of aether, it is really a matter of interpretation. so, why cannot the electromagnetic properties of atoms in "space" be an aether; to w... 23 Jun 2010 21:42

Richard P. Feynman articulated the foundation of scientific integrity
"Sam" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> QUOTED & wrote: 7:10 pm, Sam <sworml...(a)gmail.com> QUOTED & wrote: SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN MAGAZINE: When Scientists Sin Fraud, deception and lies in research reveal how science is (mostly) self-correcting http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=when-scientists-sin&sc=DD_201... 28 Jun 2010 15:04

Could Dark Matter be the Dirac Sea?
Just a random thought that I didn't know where else to throw ... Could dark matter be the dirac sea? ... 24 Jun 2010 15:16

If no neutral charge, all forces can be explained
If as in the prior post, the electron & proton do not truly form a neutral charge that the answer for ALL the forces can be EASILY explained, and the foundation for the Unified Field Theory. The best simple model is two identical atoms with a single proton nucleus and single electron orbital to determine all the ... 25 Jun 2010 02:16

No neutral charge
I very much doubt a proton & electron create a neutral charge, it seems more than likely they jumped to the conclusion because of the equal number required in elements. Where as that circumstance of equal numbers most likely also due to the inner repulsion between negative charges. As well since permeability &... 23 Jun 2010 13:58