Significant Pure Assembler Application In MASM ?
in [ASM]
|
Prev: aeBIOS Test Request
Next: CMOVcc vs. Jcc
From: Betov on 8 Oct 2007 12:33 Gilles Chehade <veins(a)evilkittens.org> �crivait news:slrnfgk06e.3gc.veins(a)evilkittens.org: > You do know that there also examples of code stealing and relicensing > in the GPL community right (and not so long as one month ago) ? Yes. This is exactly what i am saying above. > Before bashing other communities, make sure you don't do it on behalf > of one doing the same. Which other "communities" are you talking about? I suppose that you miss-readed what i have written... Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: rhyde on 8 Oct 2007 12:56 On Oct 8, 8:01 am, Betov <be...(a)free.fr> wrote: > "rh...(a)cs.ucr.edu" <rh...(a)cs.ucr.edu> écrivaitnews:1191854783.474247.178630(a)r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > > > If this is so true, why did they stop after creating some "demos" and > > not actually write all these applications you're talking about? > > Because, as you had done nothing at that time, they were > much dispited of not having the tremendous advantages of > HLA, clown. That's it. Change the subject rather than answer the question. The bottom line is that they *didn't* write these applications you talk about. Indeed, according to you, you're about the only person writing such applications. Tell us about this "assembly rebirth" again? I guess it means that Rene Tournois has written three or four applications and combined them all into a single program. Yeah for the assembly rebirth! hLater, Randy Hyde
From: randyhyde on 8 Oct 2007 13:00 On Oct 7, 7:03 am, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...(a)nohavenot.cmm> wrote: : > > You've got a point. Once you've downloaded FASM, HLA's backend, just what > do you need HLA for? Perhaps if FASM compiled HLA code, you would have a point. > You've now got an assembler, and if you want high > level functionality there is always C, correct? Perhaps if C compiled HLA code, you'd have a point. hLater, Randy Hyde
From: randyhyde on 8 Oct 2007 13:02 On Oct 8, 3:37 am, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...(a)nohavenot.cmm> wrote: > > Tomasz Grysztar says: > > 1) "...that the syntax I've chosen for fasm, was primarily imitating the one > I was using when programming with TASM..." > 2) "TASM offered two modes, with different syntaxes, ... and the second one > called Ideal mode." > 3) "...I've followed the NASM in interpreting the square brackets as a > variable..." Randy Hyde sez: "I followed MASM in using the 'dup' operator to repeat a string of constant values multiple time." Therefore, we can conclude that HLA's syntax is based on MASM. > 4) "...another feature taken from NASM, which is that any operand can be > preceded with size operator..." > > I.e., "TASM ideal"+3+4 == NASM syntax. Your comments are just as ridiculous as the one above. There is no question that FASM has been influenced by a lot of different products, NASM included. That does *not* imply, however, that FASM syntax is equal to, or even based on, NASM syntax. hLater, Randy Hyde
From: Gilles Chehade on 8 Oct 2007 13:06
On 2007-10-08, Betov <betov(a)free.fr> wrote: > Gilles Chehade <veins(a)evilkittens.org> �crivait > news:slrnfgk06e.3gc.veins(a)evilkittens.org: > > >> You do know that there also examples of code stealing and relicensing >> in the GPL community right (and not so long as one month ago) ? > > Yes. This is exactly what i am saying above. > > >> Before bashing other communities, make sure you don't do it on behalf >> of one doing the same. > > Which other "communities" are you talking about? > > I suppose that you miss-readed what i have written... > > > Betov. > >< http://rosasm.org > > Oh yeah, I apologize as I did misread while making a confusion about you and your friend throwing flowers at the GPL ;-) -- Booze is the answer. I don't remember the question. |