The Value Of An Apology, At Least From A Republican's Perspective!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Pittsburgh
Next: Incompatible jpeg?
From: Ray Fischer on 5 Oct 2009 22:17 mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: > >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... >> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >> >>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for. >>>> >>>> No you didn't. >>>> >>>>> Now you sad little man >>>>>go fid it yourself. >>>> >>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he actually >>>> posts. >>>> >>>You are the liar, >> >> "I know you are but what am I?" >> >> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or >> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course, >> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather >> lie than admit that you're wrong. >> >You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the More of the same pathetic whining, but no evidence. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: mikey4 on 5 Oct 2009 22:43 "Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message news:4acaa8ce$0$1658$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... > mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >> >>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... >>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >>> >>>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for. >>>>> >>>>> No you didn't. >>>>> >>>>>> Now you sad little man >>>>>>go fid it yourself. >>>>> >>>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he >>>>> actually >>>>> posts. >>>>> >>>>You are the liar, >>> >>> "I know you are but what am I?" >>> >>> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or >>> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course, >>> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather >>> lie than admit that you're wrong. >>> >>You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the > > More of the same pathetic whining, but no evidence. > more of the same sad little man, you must be a lonely person.
From: Ray Fischer on 5 Oct 2009 22:48 mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: > >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >news:4acaa8ce$0$1658$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... >> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >>> >>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>>news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... >>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >>>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >>>>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for. >>>>>> >>>>>> No you didn't. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Now you sad little man >>>>>>>go fid it yourself. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he >>>>>> actually >>>>>> posts. >>>>>> >>>>>You are the liar, >>>> >>>> "I know you are but what am I?" >>>> >>>> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or >>>> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course, >>>> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather >>>> lie than admit that you're wrong. >>>> >>>You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the >> >> More of the same pathetic whining, but no evidence. >> >more of the Run along, child. You've been spanked again. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Bob Larter on 12 Oct 2009 22:16
Ray Fischer wrote: > Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> SMS wrote: >>>>> Bob Larter wrote: > >>>>>> Don't you think it's kind of hypocritical that on the one hand >>>>>> right-wingers oppose abortion, calling it murder, and yet on the other >>>>>> hand, they support the death penalty? >>>>> Actually no. With abortion I can at least understand their opposition, >>>>> even if I don't agree with it. >>>>> >>>>> At what number of weeks in the pregnancy would you say that abortion is >>>>> no longer acceptable? Clearly few people would support it at 38 weeks. >>>>> What about 27 weeks? >>>> Given that my son was born at 26 weeks, & is now a perfectly healthy 8 >>>> year old, abortions as late as that do bother me a lot. >>> Less than 1% of all abortions occur in the 3rd trimester and those few >>> are almost always done for medical need. >> In such cases, I don't have a problem with them. > > How generous of you to grant a woman a choice with her pregnancy. It's not a matter of me 'granting' anything, it's just that late-term abortions bother me. I don't question the right of a woman to have one. >>>> That said, I >>>> still believe that the woman's right to choose trumps the rights of the >>>> foetus. >>>> >>>>> While their opposition to RU486 is pretty >>>>> ridiculous, at least you can see where they are coming from in opposing >>>>> abortion after the fetus is more than a few weeks old. >>>> My personal dividing line is at the point where the foetus is viable >>>> outside the womb. Currently, I think that's around 24 weeks. >>> Only if you have a million dollars to spend on medical care. A more >>> practical limit of viability would be around 33 weeks. >> Not so. Here in Australia, where we have free, universal healthcare, my >> son's birth & followup treatments didn't cost his mother or I a single cent. > > Somebody has to pay for it. 24-week preemies are VERY expensive and > lifelong medical problems are a near certainty. Nonetheless, his birth cost me nothing more than what I already contribute to the Medicare system in taxes. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |