From: Joe on

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:889nqsF71jU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Joe wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote
>>> Joe wrote
>
>>>> Well, my concern with Acronis is that- I could figure out how to run
>>>> it to make backups and create an image- but if my drive crashes and I
>>>> need to do a restore- that's when I'm likely to freak out.
>
>>>> Can it restore an image easily to a larger drive of a different brand?
>
>>> Yes, completely effortlessly in fact.
>
>>>> Since the image would contain the boot sector which has info about the
>>>> old drive- if I install the image to a new drive, what happens then?
>>>> Will the new drive boot up properly?
>
>>> Yes.
>
>> so then what happens to make sure the new drive gets the boot sector
>> corrected regarding the hard drive info?
>
> The restore does that.






awesome! I had no idea!

thanks everyone!
Joe








>
>>>> I wish I had a lot of old computers to just experiment with.
>
>>> You just need one to experiment with, not a lot.
>
>>>> Years ago I did a fair amount of "geek work" but I've forgotten
>>>> most of it- and this stuff evolves so quickly I've lost my confidence.
>
>>> Then get another system and experiment with that.
>
>>>> "edfair" <edfair.4cpf8t(a)no.email.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:edfair.4cpf8t(a)no.email.invalid...
>
>>>>> I waffle between Acronis and PCBackup for my customers. PCB is now
>>>>> something else, was MIGO but has been renamed again.
>
>>>>> One advantage of Acronis is the image you can get, then use that to
>>>>> rebuild the system, with the overhead of all the extra stuff imaged.
>>>>> PCB would require a reload of the OS and then a restore to
>>>>> just get your data.
>
>>>>> Or a combination, weekly image with Acronis and a daily with something
>>>>> else.
>
>