canon 300D, same as DS6041 model?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Linda Nieuwenstein on 26 Aug 2005 09:22 "Skip M" wrote>> > You REALLY need to read what you quote, you are looking sillier by the > moment. That release says the 70-300 is meant to appeal to serious > amateurs. > You REALLY need to stop repeating yourself, you are looking like a person who drives the knife in good and deep. Either that or you are just slow to get the point. Take care, Linda
From: Linda Nieuwenstein on 26 Aug 2005 09:27 "Skip M" wrote >> > You don't get it, though. You said most new lenses will be EF-S, not most > new lenses not meant for pro use. And the 70-300 isn't meant for pro use, > anyway. And Phil's site, which you have proven so fond of quoting, backs > that up, by the way. > And you don't get that the OP was talking about consumer level dSLR. Yes I should have added the words 'most consumer level' to my original reply for the sake of the less intuitive, word-by-word reader of the thread. Take care, Linda
From: Linda Nieuwenstein on 26 Aug 2005 09:29 "Skip M" wrote > My, this is fun, I think I'll wait to kill file you to see how deep you dig > yourself in. > Stop being such a Sally. Kill file me now please instead of parading like a peacock. Take care, Linda
From: Bruce Graham on 26 Aug 2005 23:29 In article <slrndgv18p.gbl.zed(a)resonant.org>, zed(a)resonant.org says... > What I probably ought to do is go rent everything I'm interested in on > the same day in October sometime and just shoot a whole slew of tests. > > Nah, just enjoy those long hikes and stay fit. Better for you than poring over pixels especially when the equipment will be different a few months later anyway.
From: Skip M on 27 Aug 2005 00:06
"Linda Nieuwenstein" <buzzball(a)REMOVETHIS-allstream.net> wrote in message news:bNEPe.105$hW.46(a)tor-nn1... > > "Skip M" wrote >> >> You don't get it, though. You said most new lenses will be EF-S, not >> most new lenses not meant for pro use. And the 70-300 isn't meant for >> pro use, anyway. And Phil's site, which you have proven so fond of >> quoting, backs that up, by the way. >> > And you don't get that the OP was talking about consumer level dSLR. Yes I > should have added the words 'most consumer level' to my original reply for > the sake of the less intuitive, word-by-word reader of the thread. > > Take care, > Linda > Well, then, the 70-300 fits that request, too, doesn't it? It's a lens aimed at the serious amateur. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |