Canon and Panasonic: updated models
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: DanP on 28 May 2010 16:29 On May 28, 8:11 pm, C. Werner <n...(a)noaddress.com> wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 11:55:01 -0700 (PDT), DanP <dan.pe...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > >On May 28, 2:40 am, John Navas <jnsp...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:22:59 -0700, SMS <scharf.ste...(a)geemail.com> > >> wrote in <4bff1afc$0$1591$742ec...(a)news.sonic.net>: > > >> >On 27/05/10 4:22 PM, Bowser wrote: > > >> >> Uh, not really. I own an FZ35 and while I love it, it's clearly not in > >> >> the same league as any DSLR with regards to image quality or AF speed. > >> >> Not to say it's bad; it's quite good. But nowhere near a DSLR. > > >> >You've got to understand the issue here. Apparently our favorite troll > >> >has an FZ-35/FZ-38 so by default that camera becomes the perfect camera > >> >and it can have no faults. > > >> >Unlike you and I, who could objectively look at most any item we own and > >> >point out both its highs and lows to someone who inquires about it, > >> >there are people that immediately after purchasing an item feel > >> >compelled to justify the purchase to the entire world and make it clear > >> >that their purchasing decision was in fact the best possible one. It's > >> >deep-seated insecurity that causes this behavior. > > >> >The reality is that it at low ISO settings the FZ-35/FZ-38 produces > >> >acceptable results, and it has many highly desirable features. > >> >But it is neither the best quality ZLR in terms of noise or image > >> >quality, nor is it anywhere close to quality of a D-SLR. > > >> The actual reality is that you have zero experience with any of these > >> cameras, and have no idea what you're talking about. > > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> John > > >> Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, > >> it makes you a dSLR owner. > >> "The single most important component of a camera > >> is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams > > >Erm, have you ever tried a DSLR? > > >DanP > > I sold my favorite one (and gave a couple away) when I found out that > high-quality P&S cameras were far more adaptable and versatile with just as > good, if not better, image quality in some of them. You might want to > actually compare cameras some day and put them through their paces instead > of listening to all the insecure trolls online trying to justify why they > wasted so much money trying to get their DSLRs to get decent snapshots. If > you had as many wide-ranging creative requirements as I do for my > photographic gear, and could actually think for yourself, you'd ditch your > DSLRs too. If you want to keep on this muppet show you have to answer as John Navas. Otherwise why do you answer my question directed to him? DanP
From: Jeff Jones on 28 May 2010 17:08 On Fri, 28 May 2010 20:08:08 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >You might be surprised at who views my shots... I wouldn't be surprised at all. I've already seen the kind of dreck crapshots posted by those that encourage you here. Why should others that do the same (encourage you) be any less terrible at their own photography because they use email.
From: Dudley Hanks on 28 May 2010 17:14 "Jeff Jones" <jj197109671(a)mailinator.com> wrote in message news:c1c006dse0ersts5i5clq7mag42abs7vlh(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 28 May 2010 20:08:08 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" > <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >>You might be surprised at who views my shots... > > I wouldn't be surprised at all. I've already seen the kind of dreck > crapshots posted by those that encourage you here. Why should others that > do the same (encourage you) be any less terrible at their own photography > because they use email. > Jeff / LOL / GR, the difference between you and I is that you start with your own ideas / opinions / prejudices and devote your energy to bringing the world down to your level, while I start with my own abilities and consult the world in order to improve both my abilities and the understanding of others as to the arbitrary nature of societies understanding of persons with disabilities. Take Care, Dudley
From: Jeff Jones on 28 May 2010 17:22 On Fri, 28 May 2010 21:14:36 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > the difference between you and I is that you start with >your own ideas / opinions / prejudices and devote your energy to bringing >the world down to your level Quite the contrary. I short out the wheat from the chaff. I'm a photographer. I find those rarest of gems in the most unlikely places. It's part of being a photographer. Looking for gold amongst the world's trash. Your photography is trash. That simple.
From: Jeff Jones on 28 May 2010 17:24
On Fri, 28 May 2010 21:14:36 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > the difference between you and I is that you start with >your own ideas / opinions / prejudices and devote your energy to bringing >the world down to your level Quite the contrary. I sort out the wheat from the chaff. I'm a photographer. I find those rarest of gems in the most unlikely places. It's part of being a photographer. Looking for gold amongst the world's trash. Your photography is trash. That simple. |