From: John H Meyers on
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:51:04 -0500, I wrote:

> Rob seems to be suggesting that it might benefit 50G sales
> if no one else experienced any "hiccups" trying to use it on 50G,
> even if they neglected to have scoured the manual to find relief.

Imagine even a store clerk trying to demonstrate a 50G
to potential purchasers -- what if the equation library
might seem a great thing to demonstrate,
but it just wouldn't work?

Store clerks have lots of stuff to sell,
and can't be expected to intensely study manuals and become experts;
that's why "idiot proofing" seems profitable.

[r->] [OFF]
From: Rob on
Well, I'm not sure if it will help sales to fix it as much as it would
hurt sales to NOT fix it.... Not much benefit to sales to fix something
that the customer base expects to work in the first place.

John H Meyers wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:46:20 -0500:
>
> > Rob wrote:
> > When did I say that I used it on a 49?
> > I used this library for years on my 48,
> > and never had a single problem with it.
>
> Rob seems to be suggesting that it might benefit 50G sales
> if no one else experienced any "hiccups" trying to use it on 50G,
> even if they neglected to have scoured the manual to find relief.
>
> [r->] [OFF]

From: Rob on
....and why make users pour over the manual for some obscure note in
order to access basic functionality?

I'm not in school anymore...the esoteric parts of these machines are no
longer my primary interest...I've got a job to do, and I don't need to
have my nose in a manual all day long.

John H Meyers wrote:
> Store clerks have lots of stuff to sell,
> and can't be expected to intensely study manuals and become experts;
> that's why "idiot proofing" seems profitable.
>
> [r->] [OFF]

From: Harold A. Climer on
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:56:05 -0500, "John H Meyers"
<jhmeyers(a)nomail.invalid> wrote:

>On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:51:04 -0500, I wrote:
>
>> Rob seems to be suggesting that it might benefit 50G sales
>> if no one else experienced any "hiccups" trying to use it on 50G,
>> even if they neglected to have scoured the manual to find relief.
>
>Imagine even a store clerk trying to demonstrate a 50G
>to potential purchasers -- what if the equation library
>might seem a great thing to demonstrate,
>but it just wouldn't work?
>
>Store clerks have lots of stuff to sell,
>and can't be expected to intensely study manuals and become experts;
>that's why "idiot proofing" seems profitable.
>
>[r->] [OFF]
It would be nice if they had an HP50G emulator on a stores
calculator department's computer though. A prospective customer could
get a better idea as to how the calculator actually worked.
When I bought my first HP calculator an HP25C, I was able to
get my hands on a demo right in the store. They let me fool around
with it for an hour. That really sold me on the calc.
Harold A. Climer
Dept.Of Physics,Geology,and Astronomy
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Chattanooga TN USA 37403
From: John H Meyers on
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:33:15 -0500, Harold A. Climer wrote:

> When I bought my first HP calculator an HP25C,
> I was able to get my hands on a demo right in the store.
> They let me fool around with it for an hour.
> That really sold me on the calc.

There also used to be large demo displays
in stores that I frequented.

I recall developing a one-card NPV/IRR program
on a big HP-built store display containing an HP65
at Macy's in New York City one afternoon
(no one else cared that I monopolized it for two hours),
then I submitted it to HP, which was collecting
and publishing user programs at the time, and I
received back my packet of blank programming cards
which had been offered for accepted submissions;
however, I never did fork over the steep price
for that calculator, so I never got to use my own programs :)

[r->] [OFF]