pcbutts!
in [Spyware]
|
Prev: free hosting
Next: Discover System Updater
From: ---Fitz--- on 13 Oct 2007 20:24 Gosh Heather...he once stated that he was the owner of nasa.gov. Was it possible that wasn't true? I'd be sooo disappointed. :-)
From: jaydeflix on 14 Oct 2007 01:31 On Oct 13, 2:12 pm, "pcbutts1" <pcbut...(a)leythosthestalker.com> wrote: > >>> pls who/what is pcbutts? > >> > >>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16857468123137696406 > > > > In your first link, you claim to be a Microsoft MVP, yet I cannot find you > > (by any of the pseudonyms attributed to you) in the MVP profiles. Why is > > that? > > You can't find it becausePcbutts1is not my real name. I use my real name > in the MS groups complete with my MVP sig. Yeah. You're an MVP. And I never wear a kilt. Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
From: Rhonda Lea Kirk on 14 Oct 2007 08:30 Leythos wrote: > In article <fercbj$bqa$1(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, pcbutts1 > @leythosthestalker.com says... >> You can't find it because Pcbutts1 is not my real name. I use my >> real name in the MS groups complete with my MVP sig. > > And yet all of your posts as PCBUTTS1 were banned because of your > unethical actions. IIRC, he was banned because he refused to comply with the Microsoft TOS, not because of "unethical actions." The only server from which his posts are filtered are the Microsoft server. If he posts using a different NNTP provider (as I do), those posts will be available on all usenet servers but the Microsoft server. Microsoft has a dubious history when it comes to banning and censorship, so if I were you, I would not use butts' banning from its server as a data point in support of the case against him. I reported the Sharon Franks ID the first time I saw it (June 2006, when he posted one of his infamous links), but nothing was done then and nothing has been done since. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk AUK Galactic Killfile, 15 May 2007 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/23766545e259d53c Winner, Golden Killfile, April 2007 Co-Office Holder, Ministry of Circle Jerks, April and May 2007 Member, Human O-Ring Society, March 2003 NCB#16 BJDS#2 INAC#77 PSLCK#1 SBG#1 A-29204 Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant, as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle
From: jaydeflix on 14 Oct 2007 13:10 On Oct 14, 5:30 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Leythos wrote: > > In article <fercbj$bq...(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,pcbutts1 > > @leythosthestalker.com says... > >> You can't find it becausePcbutts1is not my real name. I use my > >> real name in the MS groups complete with my MVP sig. > > > And yet all of your posts asPCBUTTS1were banned because of your > > unethical actions. > > IIRC, he was banned because he refused to comply with the Microsoft TOS, > not because of "unethical actions." The only server from which his posts > are filtered are the Microsoft server. If he posts using a different > NNTP provider (as I do), those posts will be available on all usenet > servers but the Microsoft server. You are correct. I never cared about his ethics. I had complaints about the content of his posts, I investigated the situation, I explained them to him, he refused to follow the rules, and I blocked him *solely* from Microsoft's servers. I wanted to make sure that when we canceled a message, we did not ship that cancel message off to USENET as a whole. We (well, Microsoft.. I'm putting my MS hat back on) don't own USENET. We own our servers, and we had full right to remove what we wanted from our own servers. I'm not doing it anymore, my Newsgroup Admin role ended back in 2005 and I am not currently employed by Microsoft. > Microsoft has a dubious history when it comes to banning and censorship, > so if I were you, I would not use butts' banning from its server as a > data point in support of the case against him. You are more than welcome to question me with regards to anything regarding the newsgroup servers between, roughly, 2003 and 2005. That was my job and I took pride in ensuring that *only* ToS violators and true USENET spammers were banned. > I reported the Sharon Franks ID the first time I saw it (June 2006, when > he posted one of his infamous links), but nothing was done then and > nothing has been done since. That was after my time, so I can't speak about that. You can feel free to believe I'm not really the John Eddy who was in charge of the servers. You can feel free to believe what PCButts1 has said about his interactions with me, none of which have been true. ..... And, since it is now stuck in my head, let me get it stuck in yours too.... You can dance if you want to. You can leave your friends behind.... -jd
From: pcbutts1 on 14 Oct 2007 13:39
C'mon now tell the truth. I had a few posts cancelled strictly because I encouraged the posting of HJT logs. The was not and there still are no rules against posting of logs in any MS group. I never violated anything. You and JE were gung ho and biased in your removal of my posts and it cost him his position as admin and probably your job I don't know, I don't know you. Removing posts is way different from being banned. You didn't even bother to check the headers. Get your facts straight. That case went way beyond you and JE. If you want to blame somebody for that then blame the big headed MVP's who thought they owned the MS newsgroups. That's why they don't like me because they could not stop me. -- Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell <jaydeflix(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1192381836.133724.274330(a)e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 14, 5:30 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Leythos wrote: >> > In article <fercbj$bq...(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,pcbutts1 >> > @leythosthestalker.com says... >> >> You can't find it becausePcbutts1is not my real name. I use my >> >> real name in the MS groups complete with my MVP sig. >> >> > And yet all of your posts asPCBUTTS1were banned because of your >> > unethical actions. >> >> IIRC, he was banned because he refused to comply with the Microsoft TOS, >> not because of "unethical actions." The only server from which his posts >> are filtered are the Microsoft server. If he posts using a different >> NNTP provider (as I do), those posts will be available on all usenet >> servers but the Microsoft server. > > You are correct. I never cared about his ethics. I had complaints > about the content of his posts, I investigated the situation, I > explained them to him, he refused to follow the rules, and I blocked > him *solely* from Microsoft's servers. I wanted to make sure that > when we canceled a message, we did not ship that cancel message off to > USENET as a whole. We (well, Microsoft.. I'm putting my MS hat back > on) don't own USENET. We own our servers, and we had full right to > remove what we wanted from our own servers. I'm not doing it anymore, > my Newsgroup Admin role ended back in 2005 and I am not currently > employed by Microsoft. > >> Microsoft has a dubious history when it comes to banning and censorship, >> so if I were you, I would not use butts' banning from its server as a >> data point in support of the case against him. > > You are more than welcome to question me with regards to anything > regarding the newsgroup servers between, roughly, 2003 and 2005. That > was my job and I took pride in ensuring that *only* ToS violators and > true USENET spammers were banned. > >> I reported the Sharon Franks ID the first time I saw it (June 2006, when >> he posted one of his infamous links), but nothing was done then and >> nothing has been done since. > > That was after my time, so I can't speak about that. > > You can feel free to believe I'm not really the John Eddy who was in > charge of the servers. > You can feel free to believe what PCButts1 has said about his > interactions with me, none of which have been true. > > .... > And, since it is now stuck in my head, let me get it stuck in yours > too.... > You can dance if you want to. > You can leave your friends behind.... > > -jd > |