From: Bruce Stephens on
Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> writes:

[...]

> I use grip. It seems fairly fast to me, although i doubt i could rip a
> CD in 4 minutes. It uses lame for encoding to mp3 and the rip/encode
> config stuff is good. It's nice and handy for correcting CDDB titles
> etc, too.

If one believes Debian, grip's unsupported upstream. asunder is the
replacement, apparently. asunder seems OK, though I preferred grip for
its interface (speed is identical, as far as I can tell).
From: david on
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:43:20 +0100, Will Kemp wrote:

> On 09/02/2009 04:42 PM, david wrote:
>> Have ubuntu 9.04 installed and wanted to rip approx 200 CDs to MP3.
>>
>> Any recommendations what to use that's fast, not CLI ie has a GUI, and
>> produces decent quality files.
>>
>> I couldn't find Sound Juicer (google search recommended) in the repos
>> and just tried using K3b which took 15 minutes to rip to ogg whereas,
>> dare I say it, I can do this in XP in about 4 mins (same CD).
>>
>> Really prefer to use Linux but it needs to be fast.
>
> If you can rip it faster with XP, why do you want to use Linux?

Because I want to rid myself of MS and this is one of the achille's heels
of Linux (IMHO) that I'd like to overcome.
From: Bernard Peek on
In message <Zcynm.42299$Db2.31974(a)edtnps83>, Unruh
<unruh-spam(a)physics.ubc.ca> writes


>MP3 is a proprietary system, and you are obliged, by the patent law, to
>pay the owners for the priviledge of converting to mp3.

That depends on which jurisdiction you live in.



--
Bernard Peek
From: Bernard Peek on
In message <4a9eb31f$0$2477$db0fefd9(a)news.zen.co.uk>, david
<dave(a)antispam.invalid> writes


>I want someone who uses, yes, uses an MP3 ripper via a GUI to suggest a
>fast and good quality app that will run under Ubuntu 9.04.

The default audio CD extractor in Ubuntu is Sound Juicer, which works
fine for me.



--
Bernard Peek
From: Big and Blue on
david wrote:
> Have ubuntu 9.04 installed and wanted to rip approx 200 CDs to MP3.
>
> Any recommendations what to use that's fast, not CLI ie has a GUI, and
> produces decent quality files.

Why does it need to be a GUI?

I use abcde (which is a front-end to lame). Just fire up a terminal and
let it go. I can't see what a GUI would offer here.

Although I do use a GUI (easytag) to fix up any of the tags I wish to
change later (abcde will query cddb to get them as it runs anyway).




--
Just because I've written it doesn't mean that
either you or I have to believe it.