From: Folderol on
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:08:33 +0000
Darren Salt <news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid> wrote:

> I demand that Baron may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
> > Looking forward to the new "ARM based tablets"...
>
> Me too. Would be nice to have _new_ ARM-based desktop boxes too...
>
<aol mode = "on">
Me three :)
<aol mode = "off">

Still fire up my RPC occasionally.

--
Will J G
From: Phil Stovell on
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:47:14 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann stated in post hicvos$ro7$01$1(a)news.t-online.com on
> 1/10/10 9:37 AM:
>
>>> You're both in denial and both obviously do NOT use OO or MSO since
>>> anyone that does knows that as soon as you start any half decent
>>> formatting then OO falls over.
>>
>> I have both, and I have yet to see a document which isn't loaded by OO
>> or even fails to render properly
>
> Then you have failed to look at the information that has been provided to
> you:
>
> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OfficeComp/>
> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OfficeComp2/>
>
> When you go out of your way to stay ignorant, as you do, your views will
> be of little value.
>
>>> Its been proven time and time again and I dont intend to post the same
>>> links over and over again
>>
>> It has been claimed time and again by you and your lying ilk. That does
>> not mean that those claims have any base in reality
>
> The files I used are available on those links. Have fun denying that
> reality.

http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/iVadCc

Save it in .DOC format and import it to OO. Perhaps Word doesn't follow
ODF properly, to stop correct rendering in rival products.

Installing this:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3657CE88-7CFA-457A-9AEC-F4F827F20CAC&displaylang=en

Then:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=941b3470-3ae9-4aee-8f43-c6bb74cd1466&displaylang=en

Refuses to open the file at all. Try it.
From: Tony Houghton on
In <50DCF36114%news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid>,
Darren Salt <news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid> wrote:

> I demand that Baron may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
>> Looking forward to the new "ARM based tablets"...
>
> Me too. Would be nice to have _new_ ARM-based desktop boxes too...

Personally I'd like an ARM netbook so it can have decent battery life
without being heavy. Unfortunately they seem to be targetting something
significantly smaller than a netbook, whereas I'd want something a
teensy bit bigger if anything. A 1024x600 desktop is too small, but I
can live with 1280x800 or 1366x768 on a portable.

--
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk
From: Phil Stovell on
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:47:14 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann stated in post hicvos$ro7$01$1(a)news.t-online.com on
> 1/10/10 9:37 AM:
>
>>> You're both in denial and both obviously do NOT use OO or MSO since
>>> anyone that does knows that as soon as you start any half decent
>>> formatting then OO falls over.
>>
>> I have both, and I have yet to see a document which isn't loaded by OO
>> or even fails to render properly
>
> Then you have failed to look at the information that has been provided
> to you:
>
> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OfficeComp/>
> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OfficeComp2/>
>
> When you go out of your way to stay ignorant, as you do, your views will
> be of little value.
>
>>> Its been proven time and time again and I dont intend to post the same
>>> links over and over again
>>
>> It has been claimed time and again by you and your lying ilk. That does
>> not mean that those claims have any base in reality
>
> The files I used are available on those links. Have fun denying that
> reality.


http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/iVadCc

Save it in .DOC format and import it to OO. Perhaps Word doesn't follow
ODF properly, to stop correct rendering in rival products.

Installing this:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3657CE88-7CFA-457A-9AEC-F4F827F20CAC&displaylang=en

Then:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=941b3470-3ae9-4aee-8f43-c6bb74cd1466&displaylang=en

Refuses to open the file at all. Try it.
From: Hadron on
Phil Stovell <phil(a)stovell.nospam.org.uk> writes:

> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:47:14 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann stated in post hicvos$ro7$01$1(a)news.t-online.com on
>> 1/10/10 9:37 AM:
>>
>>>> You're both in denial and both obviously do NOT use OO or MSO since
>>>> anyone that does knows that as soon as you start any half decent
>>>> formatting then OO falls over.
>>>
>>> I have both, and I have yet to see a document which isn't loaded by OO
>>> or even fails to render properly
>>
>> Then you have failed to look at the information that has been provided to
>> you:
>>
>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OfficeComp/>
>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OfficeComp2/>
>>
>> When you go out of your way to stay ignorant, as you do, your views will
>> be of little value.
>>
>>>> Its been proven time and time again and I dont intend to post the same
>>>> links over and over again
>>>
>>> It has been claimed time and again by you and your lying ilk. That does
>>> not mean that those claims have any base in reality
>>
>> The files I used are available on those links. Have fun denying that
>> reality.
>
> http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/iVadCc
>
> Save it in .DOC format and import it to OO. Perhaps Word doesn't follow
> ODF properly, to stop correct rendering in rival products.
>
> Installing this:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3657CE88-7CFA-457A-9AEC-F4F827F20CAC&displaylang=en
>
> Then:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=941b3470-3ae9-4aee-8f43-c6bb74cd1466&displaylang=en
>
> Refuses to open the file at all. Try it.

Did anyone claim that did not happen?

You DID claim that OO works fine with all Office docs. Which makes you
ignorant of reality, stupid or a liar.

Which is it?

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: fedora 12 install woes
Next: Mouse prob