Commenting On Unused Equipment
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Dudley Hanks on 1 Nov 2009 16:02 "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message news:200911011232107826-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... > On 2009-11-01 12:15:59 -0800, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: > >> Neil Harrington wrote: >>> "John McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>> news:hckmcb$r80$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Neil Harrington wrote: >>>>> "Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:4aed04c1$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... >>>>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:30:03 +1000, Bob Larter >>>>>>> <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>>>>>> I'm a well accomplished professional. 50,000 photos on some years >>>>>>>>> is not >>>>>>>>> out of the question, >75% of that being of marketable quality. >>>>>>>> And yet you can't show us a single one of them. Imagine that. >>>>>>> On checking my "Scrapshots that beat DSLRs" folder, I find 14 images >>>>>>> that I >>>>>>> posted this year >>>>>> ROTFL! - I saw most of those images, & they weren't all that good for >>>>>> P&S shots, much less DSLR shots. >>>>>> >>>>>> PS: No, screwing with the follow-ups line won't work on me. >>>>> I'm glad you pointed that out. I tend not to notice that sort of >>>>> sleazy trick. This jerk seems determined to be as much of a pest as he >>>>> can, in every way he can. >>>> IAE, FWIW: Until youse guys stop replying to and talking about the >>>> pest, he'll continue. >>> >>> "IAE"? >>> >>>> Same with replying to Navas when he's in troll mode. >>>> Anyway, GWG. >>> >>> Dunno that one either. "Go with God"? >> >> Bingo! You got the tougher one. In any event, >> iVaya con Dios! > > ...and here I was thinking it was "Giggling With Glee" or perhaps more > appropriate to NG's and off topic stuff, "Group Within Group"?? > -- > Regards, > > Savageduck > God! What Garbage? Grinning Wide Grin?
From: Savageduck on 1 Nov 2009 16:16 On 2009-11-01 13:02:22 -0800, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> said: > > "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message > news:200911011232107826-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... >> On 2009-11-01 12:15:59 -0800, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: >> >>> Neil Harrington wrote: >>>> "John McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>>> news:hckmcb$r80$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Neil Harrington wrote: >>>>>> "Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4aed04c1$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... >>>>>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:30:03 +1000, Bob Larter >>>>>>>> <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I'm a well accomplished professional. 50,000 photos on some years >>>>>>>>>> is not >>>>>>>>>> out of the question, >75% of that being of marketable quality. >>>>>>>>> And yet you can't show us a single one of them. Imagine that. >>>>>>>> On checking my "Scrapshots that beat DSLRs" folder, I find 14 images >>>>>>>> that I >>>>>>>> posted this year >>>>>>> ROTFL! - I saw most of those images, & they weren't all that good for >>>>>>> P&S shots, much less DSLR shots. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PS: No, screwing with the follow-ups line won't work on me. >>>>>> I'm glad you pointed that out. I tend not to notice that sort of >>>>>> sleazy trick. This jerk seems determined to be as much of a pest as he >>>>>> can, in every way he can. >>>>> IAE, FWIW: Until youse guys stop replying to and talking about the >>>>> pest, he'll continue. >>>> >>>> "IAE"? >>>> >>>>> Same with replying to Navas when he's in troll mode. >>>>> Anyway, GWG. >>>> >>>> Dunno that one either. "Go with God"? >>> >>> Bingo! You got the tougher one. In any event, >>> iVaya con Dios! >> >> ...and here I was thinking it was "Giggling With Glee" or perhaps more >> appropriate to NG's and off topic stuff, "Group Within Group"?? >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Savageduck >> > God! What Garbage? > Grinning Wide Grin? All look good to me. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Bob Larter on 1 Nov 2009 22:54 Neil Harrington wrote: > "Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:4aed04c1$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... >> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:30:03 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>> I'm a well accomplished professional. 50,000 photos on some years is >>>>> not >>>>> out of the question, >75% of that being of marketable quality. >>>> And yet you can't show us a single one of them. Imagine that. >>> On checking my "Scrapshots that beat DSLRs" folder, I find 14 images that >>> I >>> posted this year >> ROTFL! - I saw most of those images, & they weren't all that good for P&S >> shots, much less DSLR shots. >> >> PS: No, screwing with the follow-ups line won't work on me. > > I'm glad you pointed that out. I tend not to notice that sort of sleazy > trick. This jerk seems determined to be as much of a pest as he can, in > every way he can. That trick is very common with net-kooks. The P&S troll is a classic net-kook. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up. on 1 Nov 2009 22:10 On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:54:04 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Neil Harrington wrote: >> "Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4aed04c1$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... >>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:30:03 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>>> I'm a well accomplished professional. 50,000 photos on some years is >>>>>> not >>>>>> out of the question, >75% of that being of marketable quality. >>>>> And yet you can't show us a single one of them. Imagine that. >>>> On checking my "Scrapshots that beat DSLRs" folder, I find 14 images that >>>> I >>>> posted this year >>> ROTFL! - I saw most of those images, & they weren't all that good for P&S >>> shots, much less DSLR shots. >>> >>> PS: No, screwing with the follow-ups line won't work on me. >> >> I'm glad you pointed that out. I tend not to notice that sort of sleazy >> trick. This jerk seems determined to be as much of a pest as he can, in >> every way he can. > >That trick is very common with net-kooks. The P&S troll is a classic >net-kook. Bob Larter's legal name: Lionel Lauer Home news-group, an actual group in the "troll-tracker" hierarchy: alt.kook.lionel-lauer (established on, or before, 2005) Registered Description: the "owner of several troll domains" needs a group where he'll stay on topic.
From: Bob Larter on 1 Nov 2009 23:15
Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up. wrote: > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:01:31 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Neil Harrington wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>>> On Oct 29, 3:19 pm, Curiouser and Curiouser <question...(a)anyisp.net> >> [...] >>>> That's about all you'd ever be good for..." absolutely must explicitly >>>> mean that you have extensive first-hand experience with male strangers >>>> giving you blowjobs. >>> Or vice versa, of course. >>> >>>> In actuality, the answer to the OP's question is quite simple, and it >>>> has actually already been provided elsewhere. Apparently you've >>>> overlooked it, which isn't anyone's fault other than your own. >>> I think he has overloaded and burned out. I'm not reading his posts any >>> more, but the last ones I glanced at seemed to be just the same fatuous >>> drivel pasted in over and over. >> It is. In fact, he's spamming. I'll be interested to see what his NSP >> has to say about it. > > Are you aware that you and others of your ilk have now proved yourselves [snip] I see that you had to switch NSPs to repost your spam, eh kook? ;^) -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |