Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?
in [Spyware]
|
From: Jenn on 4 May 2010 23:29 FromTheRafters wrote: > "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail..co.uk> wrote in message > news:9fCdndp1qcs-233WnZ2dnUVZ8nVi4p2d(a)bt.com... >> Jenn wrote: >> >>> I am a woman ..... >> >> >> With lovely green eyes! :) > > Which have irises, which rhymes with viruses - getting dangerously > close to being on topic here. :o) You made me laugh.. you get 1 point. :) thanks! -- Jenn (from Oklahoma)
From: Bullwinkle on 5 May 2010 02:01 Back at ya, punk. "PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message news:aq21u5tj2kcjgil20pemjt70hbg84insml(a)4ax.com... On Tue, 4 May 2010 16:09:51 -0400, "Bullwinkle" <BDTJ(a)loa.mo> wrote: >You and bd are two hinky FREAKS! You are an illiterate (and likely incestually conceived) troll. Now back to your rock with you.
From: Max Wachtel on 10 May 2010 21:04 On Mon, 03 May 2010 19:25:53 -0400, Jenn <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote: > > > "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message > news:hrks1d0a7j(a)news5.newsguy.com... >> From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> >> >> >> | I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way >> | pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be >> | offensive. >> >> >> >> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules >> >> Terms of Use: >> >> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, >> hateful, >> threatening, >> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable >> laws. In addition >> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam >> (injecting a >> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a >> website >> offering the >> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this >> website), the use of >> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web >> traffic to a site of >> interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This >> includes the >> Personal Message feature." >> >> > > > so whats your point? The image is not any of that. I asked my wife what she thought of the image and she said that she "was offended, it was vulgar and should not be on a public forum". -- This post was created using Opera(a)USB: http://www.opera-usb.com Virus Removal Instructions http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home Max's Favorite Freeware http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware I'm Max Wachtel and I approve this message.
From: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries on 10 May 2010 21:55 Max Wachtel wrote: > On Mon, 03 May 2010 19:25:53 -0400, Jenn > <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote: >> >> >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message >> news:hrks1d0a7j(a)news5.newsguy.com... >>> From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hot.mail.co.uk> >>> >>> >>>> I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in >>>> no way pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* >>>> intended to be offensive. >>> >>> >>> >>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules >>> >>> Terms of Use: >>> >>> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, >>> hateful, >>> threatening, >>> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any >>> applicable laws. In addition >>> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is >>> comment spam (injecting a >>> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to >>> a website >>> offering the >>> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to >>> this website), the use of >>> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing >>> web traffic to a site of >>> interest by the member, or any combination of those two >>> examples. This includes the >>> Personal Message feature." >>> >>> >> >> >> so whats your point? The image is not any of that. > > I asked my wife what she thought of the image and she said that > she "was offended, it was vulgar and should not be on a public > forum". Apparently Jenn does not understand the meaning of the word "vulgar." http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=vulgar -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey
From: David H. Lipman on 10 May 2010 22:39
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> | Apparently Jenn does not understand the meaning of the word "vulgar." | http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=vulgar Everyone's caught up on the content. Is it vulgar ? Is it pornographic ? They are moot points and they don't matter. All that does matter is the Malwarebytes' AUP/ToS and BD violating the clause; "You agree not to post ... sexually-oriented..." http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?s=6eda7899360e71e75717e9d607179bef&act=boardrules -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |