From: Polly the Parrot on
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:58:41 +1030, "Fred" <bluser(a)gaymail.com> wrote:

>Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""wassim.noujwas\"@yahoo.com is a
>tool . wrote:
>> atec 7 7 wrote:
>>> keithr wrote:
>>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool!
>>>>
>>>> Better he than the Mad Monk
>>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made
>>> krud plus the tax on everything
>>> someone else
>>> choose one wit no bullshite
>>
>> Obviously the fool wants to pay more tax.
>
>Fact is not many people don't understand what an ETS is. Simple minded folk
>might believe it's a tax on everything and vote accordingly.
>Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with associated
>bureaucracy,
>Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left holding
>the can.

And why is this fair?


From: terryc on
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:58:41 +1030, Fred wrote:


> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with
> associated bureaucracy,
> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left
> holding the can.

Can you explain how I get the compensation? I'm already getting the
increased bills
From: Rod Speed on
keithr wrote
> atec 7 7 wrote
>> keithr wrote
>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote

>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool!

>>> Better he than the Mad Monk

>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made
>> krud plus the tax on everything
>> someone else
>> choose one wit no bullshite

> Do you want to put that into english?
>
> Anyway they'll dump the Monk when the libs get decimated next time around

Taint gunna happen, the voters aint that stupid, even if you are.

> - if he lasts that long.


From: Rod Speed on
Fred wrote:
> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""wassim.noujwas\"@yahoo.com is a
> tool . wrote:
>> atec 7 7 wrote:
>>> keithr wrote:
>>>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No doubt about it. KRudd is a bloody fool!
>>>>
>>>> Better he than the Mad Monk
>>> You have a choice which is pretty much pre made
>>> krud plus the tax on everything
>>> someone else
>>> choose one wit no bullshite
>>
>> Obviously the fool wants to pay more tax.

> Fact is not many people don't understand what an ETS is.

Yes, but even the stupidest will noticed what the dud's
scheme will do to the price they pay for electricity etc.

> Simple minded folk might believe it's a tax on everything and vote accordingly.

And plenty that arent simple minded will do too.

> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with associated bureaucracy,

And ensures that there wont be any effect on people's behaviour.

> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left holding the can.

That wont happen.

> No wonder the far right Liberals are opposing it.
> They like having the option to pay tax or not.

They have enough of a clue to realise that that immense tax wont achieve a damned thing CO2 wise.

And have enough of a clue to be able to grasp that even if we were actually stupid
enough to quite literally pull the plug on all our coal and natural gas power generation
completely, that that would have absolutely NO effect what so ever on world CO2
levels, essentially because china builds new coal fired power startions to completely
replace australia's CO2 production EVERY COUPLE OF MONTHS.


From: Rod Speed on
terryc wrote
> Fred wrote

>> Compensation means the proposal is really a money-go-round with associated bureaucracy,

>> Only a small percentage of high wealth individuals would be left holding the can.

> Can you explain how I get the compensation?

You'll have to be a pov/pensioner etc to get anything.

> I'm already getting the increased bills

Not due to the ETS. Those bills are due to the fucked labor
party using the electricity industry as a source of revenue.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Prev: Win7 Family pack, now available here
Next: Win 7 Pro in USA