Using MS Registry Ceaner
in [Windows XP]
|
Prev: Please recommend one freeware to prevent USB flash disk from virus
Next: window resizing problem
From: Unknown on 30 Mar 2010 17:02 Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions instead of facts again? "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, > Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that >> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related >> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what >> they are doing to the registry that would put you around >> 99.5% > > IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better. > > > HTH, > > Twayne` > >> >> Unknown wrote: >> >>> I think it is closer to 99.9%. >>> "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers(a)cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message >>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> >>>> Terry R. wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on >>>>> the keyboard >>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters. >>>>> >>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a >>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to >>>>> properly use them. Terry R. >>>> >>>> >>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Bruce Chambers >>>> >>>> Help us help you: >>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>>> >>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 >>>> >>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a >>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor >>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in >>>> fact, most >>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell >>>> >>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the >>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers. >>>> ~ Denis Diderot > > >
From: Terry R. on 30 Mar 2010 19:52 On 3/30/2010 1:58 PM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard > That is also an outright lie. There are NO reputable cleaners. > "Twayne"<nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message > news:OePHp$D0KHA.5036(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> In news:4BB10F4A.808A52F(a)discussions.microsoft.com, >> LD55ZRA<LD55ZRA(a)discussions.microsoft.com> typed: >>> The only tool that can keep track of changes is CCLEANER >>> and it is downloadable from here: >> An outright lie: ALL reputable cleaners do so. There are lots of them. >> Since you didn't say, "I think" this time, I suppose you will site proof for your statement? Or is your comment also lacking truth? Terry R. -- Anti-spam measures are included in my email address. Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
From: Bill in Co. on 31 Mar 2010 00:02 Oh come on now! Twayne has already posted hundreds of sites proving his claim of registry cleaners "improving performance and speeding up boot times", including his very, very, own, "documentation reports" (snort). You must have been asleep at the switch? For shame! Unknown wrote: > Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions instead of facts > again? > "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message > news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >> Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that >>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related >>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what >>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around >>> 99.5% >> >> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better. >> >> >> HTH, >> >> Twayne` >> >>> >>> Unknown wrote: >>> >>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%. >>>> "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers(a)cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message >>>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>> >>>>> Terry R. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on >>>>>> the keyboard >>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a >>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to >>>>>> properly use them. Terry R. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Bruce Chambers >>>>> >>>>> Help us help you: >>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>>>> >>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 >>>>> >>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a >>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor >>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in >>>>> fact, most >>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell >>>>> >>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the >>>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers. >>>>> ~ Denis Diderot
From: Twayne on 31 Mar 2010 09:18 In news:%23YQbLcI0KHA.348(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, Bill in Co. <not_really_here(a)earthlink.net> typed: > Oh come on now! Twayne has already posted hundreds of > sites proving his claim of registry cleaners "improving > performance and speeding up boot times", including his > very, very, own, "documentation reports" (snort). You must > have been asleep at the switch? For shame! You lie: I have only done so once, long ago. The White Papers have never been repeated here - I figure you closed minds can find and/or already know how wrong you are so it's up to you to get yourselves up to date. HTH, Twayne` > Unknown wrote: >> Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions >> instead of facts again? >> "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message >> news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >>> Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >>>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that >>>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related >>>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what >>>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around >>>> 99.5% >>> >>> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know >>> better. HTH, >>> >>> Twayne` >>> >>>> >>>> Unknown wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%. >>>>> "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers(a)cable0ne.n3t> wrote in >>>>> message news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> >>>>>> Terry R. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on >>>>>>> the keyboard >>>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a >>>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to >>>>>>> properly use them. Terry R. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce Chambers >>>>>> >>>>>> Help us help you: >>>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 >>>>>> >>>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a >>>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor >>>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather >>>>>> die than think; in fact, most >>>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell >>>>>> >>>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas >>>>>> the priest has killed a great many philosophers. >>>>>> ~ Denis Diderot
From: Unknown on 31 Mar 2010 10:35
I guess you're right. His registry cleaners is very similar to all the automobile gas saving ideas. I accelerate slowly and save 10% I don't exceed 60 MPH and save 8% I have regular tune-ups and save 30%. I fill up at night (when its cold and therefore the gas is denser) and save 15%. I installed a pressure regulator on my gas line and now save 35%. Brakes are adjusted to eliminate drag (friction) and I save 12% I removed the roof rack to eliminate drag and saved 18% PROBLEM is: I now have to remove gas from my tank every few days. "Bill in Co." <not_really_here(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:%23YQbLcI0KHA.348(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Oh come on now! Twayne has already posted hundreds of sites proving his > claim of registry cleaners "improving performance and speeding up boot > times", including his very, very, own, "documentation reports" (snort). > You must have been asleep at the switch? For shame! > > Unknown wrote: >> Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions instead of facts >> again? >> "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message >> news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >>> Bob I <birelan(a)yahoo.com> typed: >>>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that >>>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related >>>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what >>>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around >>>> 99.5% >>> >>> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better. >>> >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Twayne` >>> >>>> >>>> Unknown wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%. >>>>> "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers(a)cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message >>>>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> >>>>>> Terry R. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on >>>>>>> the keyboard >>>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a >>>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to >>>>>>> properly use them. Terry R. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce Chambers >>>>>> >>>>>> Help us help you: >>>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 >>>>>> >>>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a >>>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor >>>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; >>>>>> in >>>>>> fact, most >>>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell >>>>>> >>>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the >>>>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers. >>>>>> ~ Denis Diderot > > |