Virusburst
in [Spyware]
|
From: cmsix on 16 Dec 2006 23:11 "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in message news:hcqdnbyd6KBIKBnYnZ2dnUVZ_sSmnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > Yes I know and I do that. The thing is I really don't care who > copies my free stuff, I just don't like it when they accuse me of > stealing it from them when it is in fact mine. That's why the > website. There at least six other sites besides mine who distribute > spyerase under a different name with no credit given to me but they > asked if it was ok. The ones listed on my site never asked and then > they accused me. The only reason I compiled and put a password on > Spyerase is because my husband, who is an attorney, suggested it. > The license agreement to install Spyerase is iron clad and self > explanatory. It protects me. I have never been sued which only > proves my point that I am the original author. It's just the trolls > who don't believe it. It's all good. Very well then, to each their own. cmsix > > -- > > > The best live web video on the internet > http://www.seedsv.com/webdemo.htm > NEW Embedded system W/Linux. We now sell DVR cards. > See it all at http://www.seedsv.com/products.htm > Sharpvision simply the best http://www.seedsv.com > > > > "cmsix" <cmsix(a)storiesonline.org> wrote in message > news:GZ1hh.25940$9v5.16666(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... >> Ya know, pcbutts1, you can do most of the same things with a simple >> C compiler and the system() command. That way they couldn't tell >> you you'd compied someone else's work because they wouldn't be able >> to see what you did. >> >> I'm not recommending anything, just mentioning it. >> >> cmsix >> >> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in message >> news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my >>> Spyerase does? Why is there more and more posts from people with >>> problems with SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about >>> any of my stuff that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or >>> that it crashed their system. Why is that? because my stuff works. >>> How many awards has SAS won? My retail version, which has been out >>> only 2 months has already won 4 times for best new product. My >>> removal tool Spyerase, which I'm sure you already tested has >>> already been downloaded over 1000 times and I only advertise that >>> one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been hacked and probed and >>> ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be said about it because >>> it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and stop crying and I >>> won't have to post alternative products to people who need help. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> The best live web video on the internet >>> http://www.seedsv.com/webdemo.htm >>> NEW Embedded system W/Linux. We now sell DVR cards. >>> See it all at http://www.seedsv.com/products.htm >>> Sharpvision simply the best http://www.seedsv.com >>> >>> >>> >>> "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:1166295282.582269.316300(a)l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> pcbutts1 wrote: >>>>> Use Spyerase, fast and free. It now has over 1500 signatures to >>>>> remove all >>>>> variants of Virusburst,Spysheriff and others.This tool is >>>>> designed to >>>>> specifically >>>>> remove virusburst. Scan time is about 2 minutes. >>>>> First read this page http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads then >>>>> download >>>>> spyerase from here >>>>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/spyerasesetup.zip >>>>> >>>> PCButts1 - can you please stop hi-jacking every thread where >>>> someone >>>> mentions SUPERAntiSpyware with your "spyerase" - no one wants a >>>> stolen >>>> batch file. You turn every nice, polite and sincere thread into a >>>> big >>>> garbage pile. >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
From: Φ Kwatu Φ on 16 Dec 2006 23:23 pcbutts1 wrote: > Yes I know and I do that. The thing is I really don't care who copies my > free stuff, I just don't like it when they accuse me of stealing it from > them when it is in fact mine. That's why the website. There at least six > other sites besides mine who distribute spyerase under a different name with > no credit given to me but they asked if it was ok. The ones listed on my > site never asked and then they accused me. The only reason I compiled and > put a password on Spyerase is because my husband, who is an attorney, > suggested it. The license agreement to install Spyerase is iron clad and > self explanatory. It protects me. I have never been sued which only proves > my point that I am the original author. It's just the trolls who don't > believe it. It's all good. > More horsesh1t from the spin doctor. The people you cite as stealing from you have documentation, cooperation and corroboration on their work. They did not create their work in a vacuum. There is complete evidence showing a historical evolution of each tool by each author. Nobody copies from you because you haven't created one single piece of work. Everything you spout is found to be the work of others -- everything. This whole post of yours is pure manure. The fact is since you plagiarised the code of RogueFix the so-called license agreement is voided because you don't have clean hands. A legal and binding contract can not be made from a foundation of illegality and theft of another's work is illegal. I guess you still want to claim that the MVP Hosts file you now post as yours and was created by you. http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/hosts.zip http://msmvps.com/blogs/hostsnews/archive/2006/11/10/pcbutts1-_ 2E002E002E00_-the-saga-continues-_2E002E002E00_.aspx You were caught red-handed editing the file to remove the final line #end of lines added by WinHelp2002 Nothing you post is the truth, nothing including the "my husband, who is an attorney," bullsh1t. You forgot about the records about the commuter van accident you were in and are quite accessible. We were able to obtain ample information in this area. Its amazing how much data we were able to obtain. LOL
From: Nick Skrepetos on 17 Dec 2006 00:11 pcbutts1 wrote: > Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase does? > Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with SAS?. There > has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff that said it did not > work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their system. Why is that? > because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS won? My retail version, > which has been out only 2 months has already won 4 times for best new > product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm sure you already tested has > already been downloaded over 1000 times and I only advertise that one in the > newsgroups. Spyerase has been hacked and probed and ripped apart by > everybody and nothing can be said about it because it works. Fix your > product Nick, grow up and stop crying and I won't have to post alternative > products to people who need help. > Why don't you link us to your awards and your retail version. I would love to see that. Yeah, my product does not work, that's why it's on Spyware Warrior's trusted/recommended list, and that's why KVBC News (TV Station) in Las Vegas did a story on it: http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.asp?S=5821534&nav=menu107_2_7 1000 downloads? Wow. SUPERAntiSpyware only has over 2 million users. I guess more SpyErase is more popular. :( It's ok - everyone knows the facts here.
From: Dustin Cook on 18 Dec 2006 23:07 "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1(a)fuckleythosthestalker.com> wrote in news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d(a)giganews.com: > Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase > does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with As you know, I'm neutral in any threads involving you. This comes purely from a coding standpoint, and not from any personal feelings towards yourself.. Ok? Your batch file relies on certain malware having a constant filename. If the malware changes filename for any reason, your batch file will miss it entirely. SAS and many other programs (including mine) do not rely on the name of a suspected malware file, but rather a signature. Something which makes it unique.... > SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff > that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their > system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS Your batch file only works if the file isn't read only and has a constant name. If it does not, your batch file will miss it. > won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has already > won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm > sure you already tested has already been downloaded over 1000 times > and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been > hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be > said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and > stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to people > who need help. I reitterate: I am not ripping on your product, merely pointing out a few observations regarding differences between the programs your comparing. -- Dustin Cook Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis Last updated: December 18th, 2006
From: Dustin Cook on 18 Dec 2006 23:11
"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:1166332281.726134.111870(a)n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com: > > pcbutts1 wrote: >> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase >> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with >> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff >> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed >> their system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards >> has SAS won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has >> already won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, >> which I'm sure you already tested has already been downloaded over >> 1000 times and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase >> has been hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing >> can be said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up >> and stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to >> people who need help. >> > > Why don't you link us to your awards and your retail version. I would > love to see that. Yeah, my product does not work, that's why it's on > Spyware Warrior's trusted/recommended list, and that's why KVBC News > (TV Station) in Las Vegas did a story on it: > http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.asp?S=5821534&nav=menu107_2_7 > > 1000 downloads? Wow. SUPERAntiSpyware only has over 2 million users. I > guess more SpyErase is more popular. :( > > It's ok - everyone knows the facts here. Hmm... I just don't know what I could possibly add to this... -- Dustin Cook Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4 web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk email: bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com.removethis Last updated: December 18th, 2006 |