From: Rod Speed on 23 Nov 2009 04:21
John Turco wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> John Turco wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> David Brown wrote:
>>> <edited for brevity>
>> Why do you only do that to mine ?
> No, please don't take it personally.
> I don't discriminate against anybody
A likely story...
> and often delete extraneous text, simply in order
> to confine my responses to relevant comments.
My comment are always relevant.
>>>>> while Win95 OSR2 and Win98SE were solid enough to use if you were reasonably careful.
>>>> They were solid enough to use even if you werent.
>>>> So was ME if you had even half a clue too.
>>> Albeit, I must admit that Windows Millennium did cause a few
>>> minor headaches, in my roughly 33 months of using it (before
>>> I replaced it with XP, in February of 2007).
>>> One such annoyance (which is well documented, on both Usenet
>>> and the WWW) was its refusal to shut down, gracefully...often,
>>> it would just "hang" there, thus forcing me to employ my
>>> computer's power or reset buttons.
>> You sure that wasnt SE ?
> I'm certain. Well, I had used 98SE, before "upgrading" to ME;
> in my estimation, ME proved to be somewhat of a downgrade.
On that shutdown question ? Thats the opposite of what everyone else found.