Best Coolpix for HD and low light too?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: tony cooper on 21 Jun 2010 11:38 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:29:12 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote: >On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:59:23 -0400, tony cooper ><tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >>Reading her posts, one gets the impression that nothing would please >>Ms Galt more than for someone to attack her so she can blow them away. >>Kind of a "Make my day" attitude. What's the point of having the >>firepower if you never get to use it? > >Now that's funny. That's a perfect description of every "law abiding cop" >I've ever known. > >LOL! Most cops comment - even brag - that they've never had to draw their gun or fire it in the heat of an arrest. It seems to be only the movie/television cops that engage in weekly shoot-outs. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 13:40 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >> From the way this thread has progressed I would say a Nikon is not your >> best choice. A cannon would be more suitable. >> >> -- >> Pete >> > > LOL... > > Love your humour, Pete... > > Take Care, > Dudley The marxist snobs, who smear anyone as "stupid" who doesnt agree with their tyrannical politiks. -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 13:41 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > I put more stock in the rule of law, as composed by a democratic > legislature / committee, than I do in the rule of law as composed by a > lunatic neighbour with a handgun... > How do you feel about things like: * Fiscal Responsibility * Constitutionally Limited Government * Free Markets * Smaller government * Individual rights vs mob forced-collectivist rule -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 13:44 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > I put more stock in the rule of law, as composed by a democratic > legislature / committee, than I do in the rule of law as composed by a > lunatic neighbour with a handgun... And what if your mob ( legislature ) votes to seize everything you own and send you to a re-education camp? I know, serviles like you always trust your governments, up until they toss you into cattle cars, but keep in mind that the British just finally apologized for the thuggery of Bloody Sunday, which was, oh, way back in ancient history - 1972. -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 13:46
LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote : > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:58:12 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" ><dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >> >>"Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message >>news:Xns9D9DF25E5E4D5JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >>> >>> >>>>>>Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the >>>>>>supremacy of >>>>>>God and the rule of law: >>> >>> Rule of law? You put stock in that? What if some "democratic" types >>> vote to >>> make all jews wear stars on their clothing? >>> >>> "Rule of law" can mean rule of tyrannical law. >>> >>> As far as "God", some people may put no stock in that either, and >>> consider it >>> mythology. >>> >>> So where can our rights justly be derived from? >>> >>> Some claim that rights and values derive from "God", but they needn't. >>> If one >>> has a good philosophy like Objectivism, the derivation comes from the >>> most primary ownership of our own lives. >>> See http://www.PlanetaryBillOfRights.org/ >>> specifically >>> http://www.planetarybillofrights.org/ThePlanetaryBillofRights.html >>> >>> Another absurdity is the notion of "collective rights", and that >>> governments >>> have them. >>> >>> The only legitimate rights are individual rights, AKA HUMAN rights and >>> only >>> individual humans can have them. >>> >>> Governments and collectives can only have powers, given to them by the >>> people, and they can be modified or even withdrawn by the people, if >>> the people only realize that they hold the power to do so. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - Jane Galt >> >>I put more stock in the rule of law, as composed by a democratic >>legislature / committee, than I do in the rule of law as composed by a >>lunatic neighbour with a handgun... >> >>Take Care, >>Dudley >> > > Your biases borne of ignorance show clearly. How about the lunatics at > the button ready to launch a nuclear attack if they're having a bad day > and finally snap under mass psychosis and paranoia? You know, those > "might makes right" lunatics put in place and making their lunatic "law" > decisions by your beloved democratic process. How are they immune to > lunacy? They are already all proven lunatics just for considering a > nuclear attack and having nuclear arms in the first place. > > Don't you get it? Of course you don't. You're just as fuckingly insane > and fucked-up in the head as they are. > > > LOL! The sad irony of these people is that they dont trust individuals but they do trust large mobs of them. -- - Jane Galt |