Best Coolpix for HD and low light too?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Jane Galt on 20 Jun 2010 23:59 tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote : > I know Bill watches Beck, but I can't remember Bill proselytizing the > way the Galt person did. When they start quoting Beck and providing > quotes provided by Beck (usually out of context), you know you're > going to be dealing with a nutter. That word commonly used in countries where people are referred to as "subjects"? -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 00:00 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9DDEE835DB7JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >> >> I've nothing against self-defence, have gotten into more than a few >> scraps myself takin' care of business... Even had to go one on three >> with a few cops one night when they "exceeded their authority." >> >> But, my concern with the general public carrying weapons is that it >> merely escalates the likelihood of innocents getting hurt. > > Actually quite the opposite. More guns, less crime. > > http://www.gunownersalliance.com/hupp-10.htm > > > > -- > - Jane Galt Not really, current stats are based on a low percentage of gun owners to general population. As guns become more prevalent, criminals become more cautious, up until they reach a point where the criminal element knows there's going to be armed resistance, so they take precautions and get more organized. Statistics from the old "wild west" would be more appropriate to a modern civilization where concealed carry weapons are common place. Take Care, Dudley
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 00:00 Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote : > Anybody using Beck as a rational source of information is on shakey > ground. So many people bash, lie and smear about him without ever having watched a single program. -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 00:02 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >> You seriously think that the only people who would attack us are poor >> starving people in need? Seriously? With all the welfare out there? >> > > Welfare isn't as easy to get as it is painted... Single males almost > never qualify, usually only females and families... > > But, the scenario isn't confined to just starving desperates, it'd be > even more likely with somebody strung out on illicit substances of one > kind or other... > > Even in your case, a packing female, I'd be awful tempted to just grab > the purse first if the majority of women were armed, and I had some sort > of illegal activity in mind... > > Like I said, arming civilians only helps the packer when the majority of > people are not armed, and play by the rules... > > Take Care, > Dudley And you live in a country where you're a "subject". No surprise. Happy slave. "It is just as difficult and dangerous to try to free a people that wants to remain servile as it is to enslave a people that wants to remain free." -- Niccolo Machiavelli "Some people were put on this earth to be slaves. They're unhappy if they're not a slave, and they'll keep searching until they find someplace where they can be one." -- SM 101 -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 00:04
"Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9DE03B8D567JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >>> You seriously think that the only people who would attack us are poor >>> starving people in need? Seriously? With all the welfare out there? >>> >> >> Welfare isn't as easy to get as it is painted... Single males almost >> never qualify, usually only females and families... >> >> But, the scenario isn't confined to just starving desperates, it'd be >> even more likely with somebody strung out on illicit substances of one >> kind or other... >> >> Even in your case, a packing female, I'd be awful tempted to just grab >> the purse first if the majority of women were armed, and I had some sort >> of illegal activity in mind... >> >> Like I said, arming civilians only helps the packer when the majority of >> people are not armed, and play by the rules... >> >> Take Care, >> Dudley > > And you live in a country where you're a "subject". No surprise. Happy > slave. > > "It is just as difficult and dangerous to try to free a people that wants > to > remain servile as it is to enslave a people that wants to remain > ee." -- > Niccolo Machiavelli > > "Some people were put on this earth to be slaves. They're unhappy if > they're > not a slave, and they'll keep searching until they find someplace where > they > can be one." -- SM 101 > > > > > -- > - Jane Galt You obviously don't know Canadian political history... Canadians answer to the Canadian Parliament, which is not responsible in any way to Britain... Take Care, Dudley |