ELF loading
in [ASM]
|
From: Betov on 27 Aug 2007 10:59 santosh <santosh.k83(a)gmail.com> �crivait news:faun25$59e$1(a)aioe.org: > PS. Is XNews Windows specific? Yes, it is. Not "X" related. :)) Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: CodeMonk on 27 Aug 2007 11:00 Betov wrote: > > How is this, if the basic design is wrong? > I didn't say it was wrong, but it's certainly *different*. It's just that compared to what I'm used to in terms of flexibility, it's far too restrictive and somewhat confusing. I'll ignore the issues of security since those are ongoing in another thread. - Scott
From: Betov on 27 Aug 2007 11:08 CodeMonk <jascwa(a)yahoo.com> �crivait news:BiBAi.36305$t9.10454 @bignews7.bellsouth.net: > Ok, assuming I agreed with the simplicity > and speed arguments, explain how this method implies security. How do you want to loose a Source that is comming with the PE, as well as Resources and all? What more secure than this could you imagine? Saving the whole thing several times? Yes, this also is already implemented:[Ctrl]/[K] incremental saving. > You said the executable portion of the PE is always based on the > source embedded. So if I pop open my hex editor and modify the source > which is embedded - because I can since it is neither compressed nor > encrypted - Yes. You can also take a hammer and destroy your computer. You can also load the PE in an Editor like Ultra-Edit, force it in Text-Mode, and edit the source like for any text file. This is simpler than with an Hexa Editor. > when I launch the application, will it detect the change > and recompile before actually executing? Yes, it will detect it immidiatly, and warn you that the file has been modified, and that you should suspect a Virus. :) [This also, is NOT A JOKE AT ALL: Try it] Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Betov on 27 Aug 2007 11:12 santosh <santosh.k83(a)gmail.com> �crivait news:faumf5$3b7$1(a)aioe.org: > Betov wrote: > >> santosh <santosh.k83(a)gmail.com> �crivait news:faufng$at2$1(a)aioe.org: >> >>> BTW, do you compress the sources in your final PE? >> >> What for? Do you compress your Sources, on your disk? > > Yes. > > For example I recently downloaded the source distribution for Emacs > 22.1 and compiled and installed it. To compile I have to unzip and > untar the compressed archive which is ~37 Mb. After unzipping it > occupies ~140 Mb. > > So after compilation and install, I recompress the distribution. A > saving of ~100 Mb is not insignificant. :]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Keep sure than, when you will have written 100 Megas of Assembly Sources, you will be *VERY* *VERY* *VERY* *VERY* *VERY* old. :]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: Betov on 27 Aug 2007 11:16
"rhyde(a)cs.ucr.edu" <rhyde(a)cs.ucr.edu> �crivait news:1188224390.741711.117370(a)i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > have you > forgotten about the <name stolen from ReactOS>:RosAsm symbol table > bug? Oh! No, clown, i cannot forget: This was so hillarous that i still laugh each time i think of it. > Remember how RosAsm behaved before you added the ridiculous > error message (without actually fixing the bug)? Remember that the > people lost the source code in memory? In Memory, clown? Wahoooo!!!... I hope they have recovered this memory, since then! :]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Betov. < http://rosasm.org > |