ELF loading
in [ASM]
|
From: CodeMonk on 27 Aug 2007 19:26 Charles Crayne wrote: > > I have run RosAsm under WINE, and, although I did not test it > extensively, the only problem I encountered was with a permissions > problem with the debug function. > Hey Chuck. Since you're using Fedora, I guess you'd be the best one to ask. I've searched the Redhat FTP site and the YUM repository, but I can't find WINE anywhere. Any helpful info on what you did to get it installed and running? Thanks! - Scott
From: Charles Crayne on 27 Aug 2007 19:54 On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:26:58 -0400 CodeMonk <jascwa(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I've searched the Redhat FTP site and the YUM repository, but > I can't find WINE anywhere. The latest version is wine-0.9.43-2.fc7, and I got it from the yum fedora updates repository. -- Chuck
From: CodeMonk on 27 Aug 2007 20:19 Charles Crayne wrote: > > The latest version is wine-0.9.43-2.fc7, and I got it from the yum > fedora updates repository. > When I do "yum search wine*" - I get the following: > Loading "rhnplugin" plugin > Loading "installonlyn" plugin > Setting up repositories > rhn-tools-rhel-i386-clien 100% |==============| 1.2 kB 00:00 > rhel-i386-client-5 100% |==============| 1.4 kB 00:00 > rhel-i386-client-suppleme 100% |==============| 1.4 kB 00:00 > rhel-i386-client-vt-5 100% |==============| 1.4 kB 00:00 > rhel-i386-client-workstat 100% |==============| 1.4 kB 00:00 > Reading repository metadata in from local files > No Matches found Any ideas why? RHEL is actually a somewhat expensive version of Linux and I'd hate to think they actually support Fedora better than RHEL :) This might be my ignorance showing, but I'm at a loss on this one. - Scott
From: CodeMonk on 27 Aug 2007 21:02 CodeMonk wrote: > > This might be my ignorance showing, but I'm at a loss on this one. I might have an answer to my question - in linux.redhat.install someone said WINE had to many security issues to be permitted in an enterprise version of Linux. Add the fact that my processor doesn't support "vmx" and I'm starting to get a little chaffed :) - Scott
From: Evenbit on 27 Aug 2007 21:53
On Aug 27, 1:49 am, SpooK <ke...(a)dynatos.net> wrote: > Despite the root lockout (which I agree with as users should never run > root when SUDO is available), I never had such issues with Ubuntu as > Betov is describing. I second that comment. Although, there are so things about it that drive me nuts at times. Some of this is due to my dislike for Gnome ( seems not very responsive, not as flexible as I am accustomed to, and some "artifacts" ) while the rest was due to a need to explore and learn how to make it do what I want. > The thing that really sets Ubuntu apart is the software repository. No > more having to compile *everything* from source... They basically just mirror the Debian repository with some additions of their own + community contributions. This basically only covers typical popular "general user" applications, though. I still rely heavily on the standard "tar... vi README... vi INSTALL... ./config... vi Makefile... make... install" ritual for the non-mainstream fun that I get into. > Firefox destroyed the first big stumbling block, but distributions > like Ubuntu are the only serious hope for FSF/OSS to have any > considerable share of the desktop market. I am confident that the adoption numbers support this view. Nathan. |