ELF loading
in [ASM]
|
From: Evenbit on 6 Sep 2007 00:51 On Sep 5, 6:09 pm, Charles Crayne <ccra...(a)crayne.org> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:29:22 -0700 > > Evenbit <nbaker2...(a)charter.net> wrote: > > all the interesting items I want to > > build either require this 2.0 toolkit or something like QT4. > > Of the two, I prefer QT, which is also provided on the Fedora > distribution media. > Any particular reason for the preference? Nathan.
From: Evenbit on 6 Sep 2007 01:22 On Sep 5, 10:59 pm, "Wolfgang Kern" <nowh...(a)never.at> wrote: > Many thanks Nathan, > > >> ..., I better give this idea a break and wait for someone can > >> at least point to the proper source of required informations. > > Here: http://linux.die.net/man/2/syscalls > > That was what I searched for. > > Perhaps there was an easier way but now I got them on my HD, > even I now have downloaded the DIE-logo about 200 times. > I think to modify it and return the information to the public > in one single piece and perhaps more ASM-friedly :) > But this will take a while ... > I'd thought about that (might be another good use for TiddlyWiki), but there are some ASM-style compilations already out there. Randall pasted the man-pages into a PDF which you can get here: http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/Page_Linux/index.html Also, Jeff Owen has them in AsmRef: http://members.save-net.com/jko%40save-net.com/asm/download.htm That's a 'tarball' so for you I've Zipped just the wanted text files here: http://www.4shared.com/dir/2332173/37355615/sharing.html Nathan.
From: CodeMonk on 6 Sep 2007 06:25 Frank Kotler wrote: > > See what I mean? > Indubitably not. :) - Scott
From: Wolfgang Kern on 6 Sep 2007 07:05 "Evenbit" wrote: >> Many thanks Nathan, >>>> ..., I better give this idea a break and wait for someone can >>>> at least point to the proper source of required informations. >>> Here: http://linux.die.net/man/2/syscalls >> That was what I searched for. >> Perhaps there was an easier way but now I got them on my HD, >> even I now have downloaded the DIE-logo about 200 times. >> I think to modify it and return the information to the public >> in one single piece and perhaps more ASM-friedly :) >> But this will take a while ... > I'd thought about that (might be another good use for TiddlyWiki), but > there are some ASM-style compilations already out there. Randall > pasted the man-pages into a PDF which you can get here: > http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/Page_Linux/index.html You know, ... PDF and pseudoASM ... > Also, Jeff Owen has them in AsmRef: > http://members.save-net.com/jko%40save-net.com/asm/download.htm > > That's a 'tarball' so for you I've Zipped just the wanted text files > here: > http://www.4shared.com/dir/2332173/37355615/sharing.html Again Thanks a lot Nathan. It took me some time to figure out that the word 'download' beside 'comment' is a clickable link. I promise to search as advised for 7-zip and/or other untar soon :) I think to make a self-referencing single piece html out of this after I'm through with translation into NON-C ASM (RBIL-styled). __ wolfgang
From: Charles Crayne on 7 Sep 2007 00:11
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:51:51 -0700 Evenbit <nbaker2328(a)charter.net> wrote: > Any particular reason for the preference? More of an overall subjective impression than any specific comparison of features, but, in my view, I think of GTK as just a widget factory, while QT also provides a broad base of C++ classes, including string handling, SQL methods, and a printer interface, as well as a WYSIWYG screen layout tool, hyperlinked documentation, and numerous tutorials. Of course, you should take a look at each of them, and decide which best fits your needs. -- Chuck |