ELF loading
in [ASM]
|
From: Betov on 4 Sep 2007 11:10 "Wolfgang Kern" <nowhere(a)never.at> �crivait news:fbjr7c$sob$3 @newsreader2.utanet.at: > Now all what I found were Libraries and tool offers, > the page named "API-reference" seems to be a very blank one. ? Did you click on [Api References], in the Documentation menu ? ---> < http://www.gtk.org/api/ >. Then you click upon, say, "online", for "Glib"... and so on. Tons of stuff there. I did not really digged into, but i found out several details, i am concerned with. Nothing much different from the Win32 Api we are used to, in my opinion (to be verified). To me, the problem is not a this level: It is *below*. The problem is *Linux*. This system is utterly unusable. Scaring. > Where the hell are the description of this damned linux functions > from ADD_WCH until ZCAT to be found ??? Don't ask me... :))))) But if they are *Linux* Functions, i suppose they are not in there, unless the GTK stuff would cover them (I saw GTK funtions for Files, for example. So...) > Use they all just C-libraries and nobody cares how and why they work ? Does something "works" under Linux ? :)) > Someone must have written this libs, Mr. Linus himself ? :]]]]]] Have a phone ? :]]]]]] Courage. Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: rhyde on 4 Sep 2007 11:24 On Sep 4, 7:48 am, "Wolfgang Kern" <nowh...(a)never.at> wrote: > > Where the hell are the description of this damned linux functions > from ADD_WCH until ZCAT to be found ??? These are *not* Linux functions. > Use they all just C-libraries Sounds like it. As the GTK is written in C, this is almost assuredly the case. > and nobody cares how and why they work ? That is, after all, the purpose of having libraries. So you don't have to worry about how and why they work. All you need to know is *what* they do and how to call them. > Someone must have written this libs, Mr. Linus himself ? I thought you were reading the GTK page? You do realize that GTK (Gimp Tool Kit) is *not* a part of Linux, right? If you go here http://www.gtk.org/people.html, you will find a list of people responsible for the GTK. hLater, Randy Hyde
From: Betov on 4 Sep 2007 13:23 Frank Kotler <fbkotler(a)verizon.net> �crivait news:kqfDi.7240$5x2.1160 @trndny07: > http://mysite.verizon.net/fbkotler/gtk_asm-samples-6.4.tar.bz2 These examples show a problem (for RosAsm), with the modules names including '.'. I will have to modify a little bit the RosAsm convention, because of this, but... how? Actually, we have something rather complex. Example: * call "DllName.FunctionName" ; The normal way. * call "ModuleName.ext.FunctionName" ; For any Module Type. * Call "FunctionName" ; Once a complete form has been given. Which achieves into problems like: * call "Module.Name.02.Function.Name" !!!... So, if the Modules Names can include a '.', and/or if the Functions names can include a '.', i have to redefine the writing convention. What separator to choose then, is a problem: I have seen terrific namings in Visual Basic, for example, that RosAsm could never re-assemble. Ideas? Betov. < http://rosasm.org >
From: CodeMonk on 4 Sep 2007 14:18 What, no inside EBay jokes yet? >Frank wrote: >> >> I can make your little woman >> talk all out of her head >> Oh wait, that was an inside E-Bay joke. You Ling-Fu good. Award you Blue Belt. But no, she wasn't amused :) So, I'll see your "Spy Games" DVD and raise you an "Enemy of the State". This game is being recorded right? I like watching the replay afterwards. - Scott PS: Spare me the new Eli Lilly meds.
From: Frank Kotler on 4 Sep 2007 19:16
CodeMonk wrote: .... > PS: Spare me the new Eli Lilly meds. Absolutely!!! Do you realize that doctors peddle drugs they haven't even *tried*? Best, Frank |