From: George Kerby on



On 11/2/09 5:04 PM, in article dapue5ls83nh73apv9km3lnue8ch7hv9od(a)4ax.com,
"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:04:57 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com>
> wrote in <4aee4c5b$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>:
>
>> John Navas wrote:
>>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:15:09 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote in <4aed1960$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>:
>>>
>>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The Panasonic Leica super-zoom actually outperforms a prime on a
>>>>> comparable dSLR, as shown by 3rd-party test data I've posted here
>>>>> previously.
>>>> Really? I must have missed that post. Care to post the link again?
>>>
>>> "Google is your friend."
>>
>> In other words: "No, I can't."
>
> In other words, "No I can't be baited with silly, childish taunts."
> You obviously have no real interest.

Set your clock, NavASS, you're still on your P&S Troll time.

From: David J Taylor on

"John Turco" <jtur(a)concentric.net> wrote in message
news:4B0A2ECB.F70F5C6(a)concentric.net...
[]
> Still, even on close-up shots, my two "super zoom" cameras both excel.
> For example, a flower will typically appear to practically jump out
> of my monitor screen, as it's so isolated from its background...a kind
> of "3D" effect, as it were.
>
> My lone DSLR (Pentax K100D) can't match such "bokeh," it seems. However,
> I have only one compatible lens (28mm F3.5-80mm F5.6), which was bundled
> with my Pentax ZX-60 kit (35mm autofocus SLR); better "glass" would
> improve the K100D's overall performance, most likely.
>
>> Well explained here, as I'm sure you know:
>> http://www.clarkvision.com/photoinfo/dof_myth/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>
> For my tastes, Roger Clark's Web site is far too technical to be
> interesting.
>
> --
> Cordially,
> John Turco <jtur(a)concentric.net>

I'm trying to compare as near as possible like with like, so at the same
35mm equivalent focal length and f/number. You can indeed get good
results with a small-sensor camera if you know how to use it.

I enjoy Roger's site!

Cheers,
David