I'm so proud, I weaned someone off a P&S to a DSLR!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Immigration: The shocking truth about the immigrants who openedthe floodgates
Next: The real cost of being sued by Getty
From: John Navas on 1 Nov 2009 12:02 On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:14:29 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in <4aed1938$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>: >John Navas wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:21:28 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >> wrote in <4aeb9f2b$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>: >> >>> John Navas wrote: >>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:44:05 +1100, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >>>> wrote in <4aead188$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>: >>>> >>>>> tony cooper wrote: >>>>>> That, in itself, is one of the best reasons to own a dslr and not a >>>>>> p&s. I don't like paying for a ticket and have some idiot in front of >>>>>> me standing up to fire off a flash picture of dots in the distance. >>>>> Too true. Any time I'm photographing a gig, I'm an invited guest. If >>>>> some P&S shooter refuses to move out of the way, I can just ask security >>>>> to move them for me. >>>> How silly and arrogant. I'd hazard a guess that you're no more welcome. >>> Like I said, I'm generally shooting at the invitation of the performers. >> >> Read what I wrote more carefully. > >Read what I wrote more carefully - I'm talking about gigs that the >performers have invited me to photograph. Naturally, my needs take >priority over random people with P&S cameras. (Or worse yet, people >trying to get photos with camera-phones.) Audience be damned. Why am I not surprised. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 1 Nov 2009 12:06 On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:17:55 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in <4aed1a06$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>: >nospam wrote: >> <http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/FZ28/FZ28A.HTM> >> Shutter lag: Full autofocus shutter lag is good, at 0.50 second at >> wide angle and 0.81 second at full telephoto. > >LOL. 0.5 - 0.81 second? That's awful. That's with full "intelligent" auto default settings. Response is excellent with appropriate settings. As you might know if you had any actual experience, and interest other than misleading bashing. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 1 Nov 2009 12:06 On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:15:09 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in <4aed1960$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>: >John Navas wrote: >> The Panasonic Leica super-zoom actually outperforms a prime on a >> comparable dSLR, as shown by 3rd-party test data I've posted here >> previously. > >Really? I must have missed that post. Care to post the link again? "Google is your friend." -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: nospam on 1 Nov 2009 11:38 In article <hqfre51j9dmhm2ji8hrqjc1eludvpi02ba(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >LOL. 0.5 - 0.81 second? That's awful. > > That's with full "intelligent" auto default settings. > Response is excellent with appropriate settings. more excuses. slrs are generally much faster, regardless of settings. > As you might know if you had any actual experience, > and interest other than misleading bashing. and what you're doing is not misleading bashing????
From: nospam on 1 Nov 2009 11:38
In article <01gre55mjnqagpo9e26rpb9ld7jd4kg8cn(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> The Panasonic Leica super-zoom actually outperforms a prime on a > >> comparable dSLR, as shown by 3rd-party test data I've posted here > >> previously. > > > >Really? I must have missed that post. Care to post the link again? > > "Google is your friend." translated: it doesn't exist. |