Lester J Hendershot - The Hendershot Fuel Less Generator
in [Design]
|
From: Cwatters on 14 Sep 2009 04:52 "gabydewilde" <gdewilde(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:2eae6a6e-92f4-4333-a7bd-6ed0d58e30b4(a)w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... On Sep 11, 2:22 pm, "Cwatters" <colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote: > Better reference here.. > > "From the Archives of Lester J Hendershot by Mark Hendershot".. > http://www.scribd.com/doc/19041370/From-the-Archives-of-Lester-J-Hendershot-by-Mark-Hendershot I doubt "Better" is the word but thanks for the link. :-) I guess you are right. Much of what you posted are articles from newspapers and journalists are known for their accuracy of reporting and would never try to link a famous character to their story to boost it's chances of being published.
From: gabydewilde on 16 Sep 2009 22:19 On Sep 14, 7:38 pm, John Larkin wrote: > > It's interesting how many free energy devices have been invented over > the years, and how I'm still paying 30 cents per KWH. This is not surprising in any way. Take democracy, this suggests the country belongs to the people. But if we look at that what is charged for housing we can only conclude slavery has been endorsed some how. You see, if the land belongs to the people (you) then paying exorbitant heaps of cash for this land doesn't seem to add up. It suggests that running a business is not about selling products and creating jobs but the actual purpose seems to be to pay landlords. Pay for the office buildings directly, pay for the housing the employees are going to need indirectly. Compared to the actual production cost the land that supposedly belonged to the people is the main source of expenses. So called rich people live in houses that cost many millions while the actual cost of putting up the few walls using cob/rammed earth or adobe and bare hands would take a single person no more than a few years. But in stead the rich have to find a way to extract the millions from the public in order to pay their landlords for that land that by all rational democratic means already belongs to them. Or take mobile phones and wireless internet, look what handsome smacks of cash those providers feel they are entitled to for using your house as an antenna. It apparently is a privilege to be killed by phone radiation. Frequencies that are entirely free, free as in free lunch and free willy. When you compare the infrastructure used by landlines and compares it to the infrastructure needed to provide electricity to your house a remarkable difference in expenses appears. The phone companies seem to need a hundred times more money to manage small switchboxes than the giant transformers from the power company. Then they both stick all kinds of cables into our ground! Without paying for it! My cable company charges money to Tee Vee providers in order for their propaganda to be available on the network I paid for, dug into my soil. Apparently it is a privilege to be allowed to broadcast Tee Vee programs. The advertisers seem to want as much people watching their advertisement as possible. We are not even talking about things provided for free here, no they are actually paying big money in order to get you to consume their advertisement. But for some magical reason I still have to pay for the distribution! I don't actually own a Tee Vee but in order to have cable Internets I must purchase a Tee Vee package. I then become a statistic that can be sold to Tee Vee makers who can then sell the statistic (me) to the advertisers again. But ask yourself: MORTGAGE, is this good for the economy or bad for the economy? Should we make it as expensive as possible? Is that the way to go? It sure as hell doesn't produce anything, it actually makes starting a business a mission impossible. Being unable to afford storage facility makes existing businesses (thereby the ecconomy) highly unreliable. It makes wages skyrocket creating unemployment followed shortly after by homelessness and the criminal tendencies (aka trying to stay alive) that come after it. TELECOM, is it good for the economy or bad for the economy? Should we make it as expensive as possible? Is that the way to go? Should people be able to communicate or not? Do we benefit from not communicating or do we benefit from communication? Do insane phone rates stimulate the economy or do they make business impossible? Compared to the other usury it doesn't seem expensive but hey, most people on this planet eat for 2 bucks per day. So, that is what life on earth actually costs. And you are really surprised you pay for electricity that what you can be charged for electricity? I put some data cables in your ground then I charge you for the cables? Say a thousand times what the cables cost per year? Then the next year you pay the same, and the year after that and the year after until you die, then the next sucker moves into the house. The bank magically creates money for a new mortgage using the victim as collateral (LOL!) and the whole show continues all over again. And you are really surprised you have to pay for electricity? I have a bridge to sell you, it is a really good bridge etc If we would create energy for free products would become cheaper thus you would have more money to pay for electricity. It's what prices are based on, not on what things cost to make but what people are willing to pay for it. Thus, everything you earn is stolen from you every time. It leads us to question the premise of democracy that the land belonged to the people. Apparently the people don't want the land. Apparently you are incapable of acting in your own interest. This is not because you are such noble person. But it does illustrate why those advertisers are willing to pay to put their message on your telescreen of divine truth. They got you by the balls! jajajajajajaja And you've been Pavloved into defending the very system that enslaves you. Profit first then truth. Many people have tried to change the system. They failed because the sheeple dismissed it without looking into it on the premise it was to good to be true. I mean free energy? Why would anyone want that? I kinda like paying an arm and a leg for it, don't you? It feels well, natural. You know? Would rather die than to have quality of life. Who needs that anyway? Lets do another world war in stead! I've seen it on the Tee Vee, it's going to be awesum. Big explosions, screaming people with ripped off limbs everywhere. Nuclear winter, perhaps even an ice age. *drools* Follow the leader leader - follow the leader! - hey! - Enjoy your smirk, ________ http://blog.go-here.nl
From: John Larkin on 16 Sep 2009 23:04 On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:19:17 -0700 (PDT), gabydewilde <gdewilde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 14, 7:38�pm, John Larkin wrote: >> >> It's interesting how many free energy devices have been invented over >> the years, and how I'm still paying 30 cents per KWH. > >This is not surprising in any way. > >Take democracy, this suggests the country belongs to the people. But >if we look at that what is charged for housing we can only conclude >slavery has been endorsed some how. You see, if the land belongs to >the people (you) then paying exorbitant heaps of cash for this land >doesn't seem to add up. Public land, the stuff we share ownership of, isn't often for sale. If you buy land, you buy it from someone else. If you owned a lot, and somebody offered you $10,000 for it, and somebody else offered $50,000, which offer would you take? It suggests that running a business is not >about selling products and creating jobs but the actual purpose seems >to be to pay landlords. Pay for the office buildings directly, pay for >the housing the employees are going to need indirectly. Compared to >the actual production cost the land that supposedly belonged to the >people is the main source of expenses. You're welcome to build your own house. Or live in a tent. Some people do. > >So called rich people live in houses that cost many millions while the >actual cost of putting up the few walls using cob/rammed earth or >adobe and bare hands would take a single person no more than a few >years. But in stead the rich have to find a way to extract the >millions from the public in order to pay their landlords for that land >that by all rational democratic means already belongs to them. How do you propose to allocate land that everybody owns? > >Or take mobile phones and wireless internet, look what handsome smacks >of cash those providers feel they are entitled to for using your house >as an antenna. It apparently is a privilege to be killed by phone >radiation. > >Frequencies that are entirely free, free as in free lunch and free >willy. > >When you compare the infrastructure used by landlines and compares it >to the infrastructure needed to provide electricity to your house a >remarkable difference in expenses appears. The phone companies seem to >need a hundred times more money to manage small switchboxes than the >giant transformers from the power company. 60 Hz power doesn't need a lot of signal processing. But I pay a lot more for electricity than I do for land-line phone service. About ten times as much. > >Then they both stick all kinds of cables into our ground! Without >paying for it! > >My cable company charges money to Tee Vee providers in order for their >propaganda to be available on the network I paid for, dug into my >soil. Stop watching TV. Your brain is half-fried as it is. > >Apparently it is a privilege to be allowed to broadcast Tee Vee >programs. The advertisers seem to want as much people watching their >advertisement as possible. Of course. > >We are not even talking about things provided for free here, no they >are actually paying big money in order to get you to consume their >advertisement. It's your choice to buy or not buy. > >But for some magical reason I still have to pay for the distribution! No you don't. Opt out. > >I don't actually own a Tee Vee but in order to have cable Internets I >must purchase a Tee Vee package. Opt out of the internet, too. We'd all be happier. > >I then become a statistic that can be sold to Tee Vee makers who can >then sell the statistic (me) to the advertisers again. > >But ask yourself: > >MORTGAGE, is this good for the economy or bad for the economy? Should >we make it as expensive as possible? Is that the way to go? It sure as >hell doesn't produce anything, it actually makes starting a business a >mission impossible. Being unable to afford storage facility makes >existing businesses (thereby the ecconomy) highly unreliable. It makes >wages skyrocket creating unemployment followed shortly after by >homelessness and the criminal tendencies (aka trying to stay alive) >that come after it. All you need to start a business is ideas and energy. Try it some time. John
From: Benj on 17 Sep 2009 00:34 On Sep 11, 4:24 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > Leonardo Been wrote: > > And you see from the INSTANT responses of the (known) Criminal Minds > > VIOLENTLY opposing the simplest of truth, how NECESSARY it is, to > > understand these, who are in fact Demonic Creatures, and they "think" > > and behave like it. > > All of this crank stuff is available for free on the internet and > it is still not used. That means that even free is too expensive. > The real reason it is not used is that it does not work. But that > does not help paranoid people understand. And you aren't a "crank"? Tell us again now planes will never operate without propellers the way that idiot Hendershot predicted. Tell us again now "everybody knows" that planes need a propeller. Tell again how anyone who believes Hendershot that a propeller might not be necessary is an idiot. Let's all laugh at Hendershot and his stupid idea! Do you ever get tired of this "debunking" game of liars dice? Oh that's right you get paid to do this, don't you?
From: Benj on 17 Sep 2009 00:38
On Sep 12, 2:16 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > Gaby is parnoid and stupid at the same time. He thinks > that people are supressing things that are freely available. > He does not understand that all these things he wants to > believe in are frauds. Meyer was a fraud. His work is free > and that is still to much to charge for it. The other > systems below are other frauds. In other words it's worth more than what we pay to read your ignorant posts. You should take your religious beliefs over to some church group. Around here we are skeptics. And that means we are REALLY skeptical of all your blather. It doesn't even make sense, let alone involve science. You are not God. Your opinion doesn't impress us here. When you have some verifiable facts come back and let us know. |