in [Science]

LWalk, do you see why Iain Davidson has a error filled fake proof? #4.15 Correcting Math Archimedes Plutonium wrote: sttscitrans (a)tesco.net wrote:
LWalk, according to Math Forum that site---sttsc is registered to a
Iain Davidson.
But the trouble with that is there is no Iain Davidson showing up as
ever being a
mathematician in the UK, or graduated with a math degree. So whether
he is using
a...
24 Jul 2010 18:49
Lwalk or Mr. Transfer P becoming the third human to do the only valid correct Indirect Euclid IP #4.14 Correcting Math Transfer Principle wrote: So AP is asking me to settle the dispute between himself and the anonymous poster (on Google, he appears only via the email address sttscitrans (a)tesco.net) regarding Euclid's infinitude of primes proof. No, I was not asking that at all. I was asking you to acknowledge a
...
24 Jul 2010 17:45
Is RH equivalent to, there are two primes between n and 2n?? #704 Correcting Math Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped a far too long of a post, but it did show two proofs of Riemann Hypothesis) I do not know whether the Twin Primes can construct rectangles in whirling rectangles as an independent proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, or, whether the Twin Primes proof which yields ... 24 Jul 2010 03:45
where is the factorial value 1/2 of the exponent value in 10^500 #4.13 Correcting Math Transfer Principle wrote: solve 2x = log(x!) for x and then clicked on "use the base 10 logarithm." Though Wolfram returns the trivial value x = 0, there is a graph, and one can roll the mouse over the non-trivial solution: (268.087, 536.175) Thus, we find that 268! is approximately 10^... 24 Jul 2010 02:41
valid Indirect Euclid IP leads to twin prime proof #4.12 Correcting Math Transfer Principle wrote: On Jul 23, 1:00 pm, Archimedes Plutonium (snipped) This is not quite being fair to me Lwalk. I deliver an entire proof, one which can be published in a book. I deliver both Direct and Indirect in long form and in short form: short form Indirect (1) definition of prime number (2... 24 Jul 2010 02:41
most simple statement of Riemann Hypothesis and proofs #703 Correcting Math Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: I am looking for the best Riemann Hypothesis equivalent statement to tie in the Indirect Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof method. By correcting that flaw of logi... 23 Jul 2010 20:13
137 to this makes 1/2 exact?? Re: smallest gap for 253! = 10^500?? #4.11 Correcting Math Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Here I am asking you a question Lwalk. Where is the factorial 1/2 the value of the exponent? Is it 249! equal to about 10^498 I think that 10^500 is closer to 252! So that my choice of the Planck Unit of largest number... 23 Jul 2010 16:56
Lwalk or Mr. Transfer P becoming the third human to do the only valid correct Indirect Euclid IP #4.10 Correcting Math Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Transfer Principle wrote: I notice that both JSH and AP are working on the Infinitude of Twin Primes, but via different methods. JSH is looking at congruences mod various primes, while AP is attempting to modify Euclid's proof so that it works for Twin Primes. ... 24 Jul 2010 04:48
smallest gap for 253! = 10^500?? #4.09 Correcting Math Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Here I am asking you a question Lwalk. Where is the factorial 1/2 the value of the exponent? Is it 249! equal to about 10^498 I think that 10^500 is closer to 252! So that my choice of the Planck Unit of largest number as where the StrongNuclear Force no lon... 23 Jul 2010 15:50 |