From: Frank Peelo on
Tony Houghton wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:47 +0000
> Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote:
>
>
>>I agree. Info is absolutely hideous. It obviously predates keyboards
>>with arrows on them - and has never evolved. Only a crazed fanatic could
>>think it was a good idea to keep writing and maintaining documentation
>>for that horrible thing. Luckily most documentation seems to be
>>available on the web nowadays.
>
>
> It has one advantage over HTML, you can do a client-side search over a
> hierarchy of pages (something that would have been a good idea for "Web
> 2.0" now I think of it). If you can't avoid info, tkinfo isn't too bad
> at all, especially if you have tk8.5 and configure it with an
> antialiased font.

or, in Konqueror, use info:/ as the start of a URL. For example, visit
this "Location":

info:/grub

From: Ian Rawlings on
On 2008-12-15, Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote:

> I agree. Info is absolutely hideous. It obviously predates keyboards
> with arrows on them - and has never evolved. Only a crazed fanatic could
> think it was a good idea to keep writing and maintaining documentation
> for that horrible thing. Luckily most documentation seems to be
> available on the web nowadays.

I've just found out that Gnome Help handles info files in a clickable
link way with a heirarchical index down the left-hand side, it's
actually quite good!

Mind you, first page I tried it on, Gnome Help crashed, same page on
the second attempt worked fine.

It also does the man pages too.

Large man pages are a PITA, e.g. mplayer's pages are hard to find
stuff on, so a good info file would probably be more useful. I tend
to dislike info too but sometimes man pages just don't cut the mustard
either.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/
From: Tony Houghton on
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:26:50 +0000
Ian Rawlings <news06(a)tarcus.org.uk> wrote:

> On 2008-12-15, Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote:
>
> > I agree. Info is absolutely hideous. It obviously predates keyboards
> > with arrows on them - and has never evolved. Only a crazed fanatic could
> > think it was a good idea to keep writing and maintaining documentation
> > for that horrible thing. Luckily most documentation seems to be
> > available on the web nowadays.
>
> I've just found out that Gnome Help handles info files in a clickable
> link way with a heirarchical index down the left-hand side, it's
> actually quite good!

Yes, that's nice, but...

> Mind you, first page I tried it on, Gnome Help crashed, same page on
> the second attempt worked fine.

....ah, you've already discovered the fatal flaw :-/.

> It also does the man pages too.
>
> Large man pages are a PITA, e.g. mplayer's pages are hard to find
> stuff on, so a good info file would probably be more useful. I tend
> to dislike info too but sometimes man pages just don't cut the mustard
> either.

MPlayer has extensive HTML help too, but I tend to use the man page a
lot more and usually manage to find what I want in it. I have had a few
years to get used to it though.

--
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk

From: Martin Gregorie on
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:26:50 +0000, Ian Rawlings wrote:

>
> I've just found out that Gnome Help handles info files in a clickable
> link way with a heirarchical index down the left-hand side, it's
> actually quite good!
>
> Mind you, first page I tried it on, Gnome Help crashed, same page on the
> second attempt worked fine.
>
> It also does the man pages too.
>
Neat trick. Worked here (Fedora 9) without crashes. I've noted it for
future reference.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
From: jasee on
>> Muppet wrote:
>>
>>> How do I reinstall GRUB please?
>>
>> Buy a copy of my book* and read section 3.8.2. This is the relevant
>> bit:
>>

> I've often wanted to be able to modify grub and this looks like a good
> explanation, however

>> (Once you have run grub from the rescue disk).
>>
>>> The way grub describes disk drives and partitions is not
>>> the same as the method used by the running system. Grub needs
>>> to find where the "stage1" program is stored on your disk, and
>>> build this information into the initial loader that it
>>> installs at the beginning of your hard disk. There are three
>>> steps to this process.
>>> 1. Find the stage1 program. If you know where it is you can
>>> skip this step. If not you can use grub to find it. The
>>> program is in a file that will have the path
>>> /boot/grub/stage1 on the running system.
>
> Running system=an existing installation of Linux?
>
>>> If you have a
>>> separate partition that will be mounted as /boot the file
>>> will be /grub/stage1 within that partition.
>
> Can't understand this maybe it means if you have a seperate partition
> (from which the machine boots) and it's also mounted as" /boot" then the
> file will >be in that partition in /grub/stage 1?

>>> If you do not
>>> have a separate boot partition /boot will be a directory
>>> within your root partition and the path to the file will
>>> be /boot/grub/stage1.

>That makes sense if what I've understood above is correct

>>> To find the boot loader if you have a separate boot
>>> partition type
>>> find /grub/stage1
>>> if you have one big partition type
>>> find /boot/grub/stage1
>>> and if you do not know try both.
>>> When Grub finds the loader it will display something like
>>> (hd0,4)
>>> which means "Partition 4 on hard drive 0". If you have
>>> more than one version of Linux installed choose the one
>>> you want to boot - the partition numbers displayed by
>>> grub may not be the same as the partitions displayed by
>>> fdisk, but they will be in the same order.
>>> 2. Tell grub which program to use. Type this command
>>> root (hdx,y)
>>> replacing x and y with the values that the find command
>>> gave you.
>>> 3. Write the initial loader to disk. Type
>>> setup (hd0)
>>> to write the loader to the first block of the first hard
>>> disk. You can use a different drive name in place of hd0
>>> to write the loader in another place, but hd0 will be
>>> correct for the vast majority of computers.
>>> You can now leave grub with the quit command and type exit
>>> to reboot your computer.

>This all looks sensible to me, however it doesn't explain what the stage1
>program is. It seems as though it's part of grub? So supposing you want to
> >boot multiple versions of Linux, there should be multiple versions of the
>loader in the different partitions? How did they get there? And how do you
>insert mutiple choices in grub?