Prev: Processing Program
Next: curanzia versicherung, berufsunf�higkeits versicherung, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung f�r selbst�ndige, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
From: Ray Fischer on 25 Feb 2010 00:50
Pete Stavrakoglou <ntotrr(a)optonline.net> wrote:
>"Mr. Strat" <rag(a)nospam.techline.com> wrote in message
>> Alfred Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Current 4/3 cameras have 12MP and the 4.6MP of the Foveon should be on
>>> the same level of a 7MP Bayer sensor camera, but not more than that. If
>>> Foveon brought out a 10MP model they would be competitive.
>> The bottom line is that Foveon is just crappy technology...unless
>> you're fond of Homer Simpson skin tones.
>Randall, Randall, Randall that's old news that just doesn't apply anymore.
>The SD14, DP1, DP2 all produce fine skintones. I oughta know, I use an
Besides, the problem with Sigma cameras isn't the sensor. It's
everything else. Their cameras are really kind of crappy and do not
stand up against similarly-priced models from Nikon and Canon.
From: nospam on 25 Feb 2010 00:56
In article <4b860fa5$0$1663$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
> Besides, the problem with Sigma cameras isn't the sensor.
that's one of the problems.
> It's everything else.
that's the rest of the problems.
> Their cameras are really kind of crappy and do not
> stand up against similarly-priced models from Nikon and Canon.
they don't stand up to *any* models from nikon or canon, regardless of
let's not forget that the sd14 initially sold for $1599 (msrp is $2000,
seriously), and the camera is basically equivalent to a nikon d50, a
camera that sold for about $500-600 before being discontinued.
From: Alfred Molon on 25 Feb 2010 02:09
In article <240220101647526375%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>,
> except that bayer isn't standing still.
Sure, but it just captures one colour component per pixel.
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: nospam on 25 Feb 2010 03:13
In article <MPG.25f04089ef3f860498c231(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred
Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > except that bayer isn't standing still.
> Sure, but it just captures one colour component per pixel.
and with 5 times as many pixels, it's ahead of the game.
From: Pete Stavrakoglou on 25 Feb 2010 07:28
"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> In article <hm3o8h$qfi$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Pete Stavrakoglou
> <ntotrr(a)optonline.net> wrote:
>> I've got too many these days. I have the SD14 (have always used Sigma
>> before others, including the SD9). I also have an Olympus E-510 and my
>> bought me a Canon 7D for my 50th. Now that's a nice camera.
> that's a nice wife.
Yes she is! She puts up with me.