From: Rich on
"Pete Stavrakoglou" <ntotrr(a)optonline.net> wrote in
news:hm45tj$pjh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

> It's no secret that they are not good high-ISO cameras. That's where
> the development has to be improved. The sensor development is still
> in its infancy, there's a long way to go.

On the bright side, fine art photo mags all seem to like the Sigma for
black and white shooting.

From: Chris Malcolm on
Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:53:50 -0500, nospam wrote:

>> In article <d0880$4b86f110$546accd9$28086(a)cache80.multikabel.net>,
>> Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You completely misinterpreted their text, making your response as
>>> worthless as everything else you post.
>>
>> so why don't you explain what they meant? or are your statements empty?

> I will if it's requested by someone who is worth the trouble. But those
> people are probably smart enough to manage without such an explanation.

There must be a reason why you spend all your time talking to people
who aren't worth talking to. Won't the others listen to you?

--
Chris Malcolm
From: Alfred Molon on
In article <250220101619430450%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>,
nospam(a)nospam.invalid says...
> and the eye can't see it, so it makes *no* difference if it's captured
> or not.

The human eye can see any detail if properly enlarged.
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: David J Taylor on
"Rich" <none(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:g4qdnY76XYONthrWnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
[]
> On the bright side, fine art photo mags all seem to like the Sigma for
> black and white shooting.
>

LOL!

David

From: David J Taylor on

"Alfred Molon" <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25f190835b8c693898c234(a)news.supernews.com...
> In article <250220101619430450%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>,
> nospam(a)nospam.invalid says...
>> and the eye can't see it, so it makes *no* difference if it's captured
>> or not.
>
> The human eye can see any detail if properly enlarged.
> --
>
> Alfred Molon

So do you want a camera to produce images, or one for pixel peeping?

David