First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
Kalman Filter with an Accelerometer
Hi, I wanted to estimate the position of something using data collected from an accelerometer. Now, I know this is a noisy process, so I wanted to use some filtering technique to get accurate position and velocity from just accelerometer readings. I was told that the Kalman Filter would do just the thing. I first d... 21 Mar 2010 17:19
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protonsto the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
On 3/20/10 4:52 AM, Magnetic wrote: Today morning they repeated yesturdays achivement. But thre were no collisions yet. The death is soon. :( The LHC has smashed the energy record--Now to the future "CERN says it will soon announce a timeline for converging the 3.5-TeV beams, which together will yie... 21 Mar 2010 16:11
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protonsto the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
John wrote: My philosophy is simple. If the world has ended and all is destroyed - I won't worry about it. And if the world is not destroyed and all is the same - I still won't worry about it. If the world is not destroyed and all is the same, it doesn't mean that you don't have a reason to be... 20 Mar 2010 12:03
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f- 47a943c9f16e(a)z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap(a)yandex.ua says... [...] If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all people will start to cosmos. I don't think "cosmos" is a verb. ... 20 Mar 2010 13:11
Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protonsto the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote: Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were acciden... 19 Mar 2010 21:14
lms-dfe implementation
Hi experts, I am a usual ng lurker but now it is time to make my first question, as I am stuck on a lms-dfe implementation issue. I use the textbook equations (implemented in Scilab) to estimate, via LMS, the filters coefficients. I do a classical LMS to estimate the fwd filter coeffs, still being in training m... 19 Mar 2010 14:20
Details on ESPS' get_f0 function work
Hi! I am experimenting with pitch analysis with the help of ESPS. Can anyone give a few hints? I cannot find in manuals here http://www.ee.uwa.edu.au/~roberto/research/speech/local/entropic/ESPSDoc/manpages/indexes/index.html about in what amplitude range a processing signal should be? Should it be [-1,+1]... 19 Mar 2010 08:09
FFT Radix 3
I have been trying to code a normal C program for a radix 3 fft problem. My program works for 3,6,9,27 points but conks off for the 81 point fft onwards. I would like to know if there is a mistake in my program or is it because VC can't support such intensive calculations ;P. Well I really don't know how to go ahead.I ... 19 Mar 2010 17:46
Capacity for QAM
Guys, I need a clarification on shannon capacity equation for QAM systems with coding. Lets assume M-QAM with code rate R Let m = log2(M) My goal is to find at what SNR (Eb/No) we achieve capacity with the shannon equation. C= Wlog2(1+SNR). I am a little confused. can someone please explain with a... 21 Mar 2010 23:13
About Shannon Limit
>On Mon, 26 May 2008 09:16:45 -0500, "zoncolan" <imarote(a)hotmail.com> wrote: Hi, I'm working on Turbo Codes about DVB-SH standard. This employ QPSK and 16QAM. I've done several simulations and now I have a graphic BER vs Eb/No for code rates 1/5, 2/9, ... , 1/2 and 2/3. I know that for BPSK ... 19 Mar 2010 08:09
First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63