From: Conor on
In article <pan.2010.01.14.22.25.34.868163(a)stovell.nospam.org.uk>, Phil
Stovell says...
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:15:40 +0000, Conor wrote:
>
> > Says the man who claims to have worked for the only �40m T/O company that
> > has never ever used macros in Exel.
>
> It's Excel, not Exel.
>
> Are you sure you you're not confusing formulae with macros? OO has both.

Do you actually know what a macro is?

--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on
In article <hio63l$la0$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann says...

> Well, several german cities seemed to be quite content with OO. Seems OO
> provided everything they needed. For example: The computers in Munich
> which still run windows have OO installed

Several German cities eh? How much of the rest of the German Civil
Service was using OOo?


--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on
In article <pan.2010.01.14.22.38.12.518987(a)stovell.nospam.org.uk>, Phil
Stovell says...

> The UK Government used to have (may still have) a policy of only using
> software that is ISO standards compliant. OO is, I'm not sure about MSO.

UK Govt runs on MSO.

--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on
In article <hiofvn$8db$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, RonB says...
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:57:29 +0000, Gordon wrote:
>
> > Conor wrote:
> >> In article <slrnhkstrh.uit.jedi(a)nomad.mishnet>, JEDIDIAH says...
> >>> On 2010-01-13, Conor <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In article <slrnhksal6.5sr.jedi(a)nomad.mishnet>, JEDIDIAH says...
> >>>>
> >>>>> Open Office is good enough to apply negative price pressure to
> >>>>> MSO.
> >>>> OOo is no use to anyone who wants to do more than a basic expenses
> >>>> spreadsheet or homework.
> >>> ...which as I said before is the vast majority of users.
> >>>
> >> Wrong. The vast majority of office users are in a corporate
> >> environment. OOo is not suitable for their needs.
> >>
> >>
> > And your reasoning for that is?
> > OO 3.1 is as every bit as suitable as Office 2003, which you would know
> > if you'd used it. Your comments so far tell us you've NEVER used it.
>
> Exactly. Most people who use Microsoft Word don't even know how to use its
> spellchecker (or they ignore it).

Unlike OOo, it works so well they don't need to.


--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on
In article <20100115074439.2116.51071.XPN(a)gordon-laptop>, Gordon says...
>
> Conor wrote:
>
>
> >>
> > Says the man who claims to have worked for the only �40m T/O company
> > that has never ever used macros in Exel.
> >
> >
>
> No claim. It's true.
>
> Get back to selling laptops.

At least its better than sitting at home on the dole as you do.

--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.