The End of m.p.s.v.
in [Windows Viruses]
|
From: MEB on 30 May 2010 00:24 On 05/30/2010 12:19 AM, David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> > > > > | Oh come on David I gave you more credit for intelligence... was I wrong. > > | What you present means zero, zip, nada... what matters is the Laws > | applicable, and they are all in Microsoft's favor. > > Bullsh!t -- > Just plain Bullsh!t. > > You are really way out in left field here. There is no bleeding property. > > Any "law" you may bring up is just not applicable here. > > Look this group is closing, I've done what I could. Let Microsoft, the prosecutors, and whomever have their fun with you. Good luck, you were a waste of time... as usual. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___---
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 30 May 2010 05:53 "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OO815$6$KHA.3176(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > On 05/30/2010 12:19 AM, David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> >> >> >> >> | Oh come on David I gave you more credit for intelligence... was I >> wrong. >> >> | What you present means zero, zip, nada... what matters is the Laws >> | applicable, and they are all in Microsoft's favor. >> >> Bullsh!t -- >> Just plain Bullsh!t. >> >> You are really way out in left field here. There is no bleeding >> property. >> >> Any "law" you may bring up is just not applicable here. >> >> > > Look this group is closing, I've done what I could. Let Microsoft, the > prosecutors, and whomever have their fun with you. > > Good luck, you were a waste of time... as usual. BTW, thanks for the hot air ... it's almost like summer. :o)
From: John John - MVP on 30 May 2010 08:21 MEB wrote: > On 05/30/2010 12:11 AM, David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> >> >> | On 05/29/2010 10:52 PM, Leythos wrote: >>>> In article <OFbbJH6$KHA.1068(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- >>>> here(a)hotmail.com says... >>>>> On 05/29/2010 10:30 PM, Leythos wrote: >>>>>> In article <uKARK55$KHA.1068(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- >>>>>> here(a)hotmail.com says... >>>>>>> Provide a shred of proof you or anyone has been legally "allowed" to >>>>>>> use Microsoft's property, these groups; that takes distinctive written >>>>>>> authorization from Microsoft. >> >>>>>> I see you still can't prove that MS owns anything in these groups, other >>>>>> than the copyright to the content that MS itself/employees post here, >>>>>> and even that's questionable in most countries. >>>>>> So, again, you provide nothing, you can't even prove your claim, and >>>>>> those of us that have worked on Usenet, been part of it, understand it, >>>>>> since the 80's, know that you're completely unable to support your >>>>>> mistaken claim. >> >>>>> You fool, I have shown you and everyone else EXACTLY what controls >>>>> this. All of you have *no leg to stand on*. >>>> LOL, and you've not shown anything. MS could say, do, jump up and down, >>>> and not a single Usenet server/company would have to listen to them. The >>>> groups can remain without permission from MS, that's the way that Usenet >>>> works, no peer has to accept any changes or requests if they don't want >>>> too and there is no legal reason for them to stop hosting these groups. >> >> | Check the group this was cross-posted to.. you will see my name [or >> | depending upon your reader maybe nothing, unless they now want to show >> | something else] as poster, no header, no message... just you quoting my >> | supposed post in response directly under it in the thread... I'd say >> | that's pretty actively controlling these groups. >> >> Look at my headers ! >> >> NOT from news.microsoft.com >> > > Guys and Gals, none of anything you present means squat... what matters > is the Law. How dense can you people be... Certainly not as dense as you! Legal arguments aside, you really don't know how this Usenet thing works, Microsoft *DOES NOT* control anything on Usenet, they control their own servers and that is it. They don't control any other independent nntp operators any more than they control independent websites on the www. All of your 'legal' gibberish would still remain to be proven in a court of law and a wise lawyer once told me that there was no such thing as a slam dunk in court and to never anticipate on the future outcome of a trial. John
From: Leythos on 30 May 2010 13:24 In article <uu2Ot76$KHA.5464(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- here(a)hotmail.com says... > Guys and Gals, none of anything you present means squat... what matters > is the Law. How dense can you people be... > And yet my Usenet provider says that they will continue to carry these groups as long as there is traffic - and since posts originating from the actual MS servers only make up a part of this traffic, it appears, by law, that these groups will continue past MS ending their involvement with Usenet. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Geoff on 30 May 2010 14:22
A quick survey of 3 Usenet servers, number of groups containing the word "microsoft": EasyNews : 4024 Eternal September: 1794 Microsoft.com : 1772 |