The End of m.p.s.v.
in [Windows Viruses]
|
From: MEB on 29 May 2010 22:17 On 05/29/2010 09:11 PM, Leythos wrote: > In article <OvvQ6g3$KHA.5168(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- > here(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> On 05/29/2010 05:37 PM, Leythos wrote: >>> In article <eSkgI22$KHA.1700(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- >>> here(a)hotmail.com says... >>>> But anything IN Usenet/use net/usenet it obtained elsewhere [which it >>>> does own, control, and otherwise, is NOT its property. So again, a >>>> useless claim. Microsoft OWNS its groups, the hierarchy, and the >>>> presentation as so stated BY Microsoft. >>>> >>> >>> MS does not "Own" the groups, and they only control the content ON THEIR >>> OWN SERVERS. >>> >> >> Nifty, but that is not factual, Microsoft documents and the Law show >> otherwise. >> >> More baseless, worthless, and material lacking merit. > > You are a lot like Alias, full of claims and having nothing to back-up > your position. > HAHAHAHA, Microsoft's documents, copyright Law, Laws against theft, and numerous others all provide the answer you people can't seem to get... Provide a shred of proof you or anyone has been legally "allowed" to use Microsoft's property, these groups; that takes distinctive written authorization from Microsoft. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___---
From: MEB on 29 May 2010 22:18 On 05/29/2010 09:12 PM, Leythos wrote: > In article <#5Kdld3$KHA.5168(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- > here(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> On 05/29/2010 05:22 PM, Geoff wrote: >>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 17:02:18 -0400, MEB <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 05/29/2010 04:53 PM, Geoff wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:22:52 -0400, MEB <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [snip] completely irrelevant and unfathomable gibberish about >>>>> copyright on his web site content. >>>>> >>>>> The prima fascia truth is that Microsoft gave up any copyright on >>>>> content of their news servers when they created them as part of Usenet >>>> >>>> Wrong. Microsoft never GAVE UP anything. Your purported arguments have >>>> no worth, value or merit. >>>> >>>> Microsoft never "created them as part of Usenet". >>> >>> Yes, they did so by creating an NNTP server for the purpose. >> >> Microsoft created the NNTP server for its OWN users and specifically >> indicated and stated that in the 1996 news release document. >> >> So again, your purported arguments are baseless, valueless, and have no >> merit. > > And yet they freely move and accept information from non-MS servers and > have no control over the non-MS servers and have never once suggested > otherwise. > > Oh yes, Microsoft does have control. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___---
From: Leythos on 29 May 2010 22:30 In article <uKARK55$KHA.1068(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- here(a)hotmail.com says... > Provide a shred of proof you or anyone has been legally "allowed" to > use Microsoft's property, these groups; that takes distinctive written > authorization from Microsoft. > I see you still can't prove that MS owns anything in these groups, other than the copyright to the content that MS itself/employees post here, and even that's questionable in most countries. So, again, you provide nothing, you can't even prove your claim, and those of us that have worked on Usenet, been part of it, understand it, since the 80's, know that you're completely unable to support your mistaken claim. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Leythos on 29 May 2010 22:31 In article <uUQBr55$KHA.1068(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- here(a)hotmail.com says... > > And yet they freely move and accept information from non-MS servers and > > have no control over the non-MS servers and have never once suggested > > otherwise. > > > > > > Oh yes, Microsoft does have control. > Prove it -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: MEB on 29 May 2010 22:42
On 05/29/2010 10:30 PM, Leythos wrote: > In article <uKARK55$KHA.1068(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- > here(a)hotmail.com says... >> Provide a shred of proof you or anyone has been legally "allowed" to >> use Microsoft's property, these groups; that takes distinctive written >> authorization from Microsoft. >> > > I see you still can't prove that MS owns anything in these groups, other > than the copyright to the content that MS itself/employees post here, > and even that's questionable in most countries. > > So, again, you provide nothing, you can't even prove your claim, and > those of us that have worked on Usenet, been part of it, understand it, > since the 80's, know that you're completely unable to support your > mistaken claim. > You fool, I have shown you and everyone else EXACTLY what controls this. All of you have *no leg to stand on*. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |