What's your guys' take on Moving Dimensions Theory? Vs. String Theory / LQG?
in [Relativity]
|
From: cjcountess on 6 Nov 2009 15:35 Hy shakespeare physics this is Conrad J Countess It amazes me that grown people studying such a prestigious subject as physics, which is to some, the highest form of the search for the Undisputed Truth with Crystal Blue Persuasion, should act so childishly, turning the Google dialogs of physics, into the goo goo -ga ga, childish dialogs, and seriously compromising its and their own credibility. As one of the few vehicles upon which some of us can test, polish, and publish our ideas, I would think that it would be recognized for what it could truly be. It could very well be one of the only networks where naturally talented human beings, who have not been given the chance by the established physics community, who may very well be more interested in who is right, and gets credit and all the grants, speeches, and publishing money, that comes with it, than what is right. I am of the opinion that truth should be acknowledged, wherever it comes from. In my opinion, some of the best theory's have been posted on this site, even if they may be few and far between. And if we really want to be taken seriously, we should treat each other with respect and perhaps even prepare a press release for some of the theory's. Why not? If everyone out there is serious about their work, why not vote on some of these ideas and present them to the press for publication, sort of what you all have done on the site that your page is posted on? This would make us more consciouses of what we say to each other, how we say it, and spur us to probably do our best work, especially if we know that the world will review this. I know my idea is ready to be put up against any in the world, especially after what I have seen on these sites. Now dont get me wrong, I acknowledged that there are good ideas here and across the web, I just think that mine is amongst the most revolutionary, and the one that most other analogically, logically, mathematical, and statistically, sound, and a =n idea that all the other progressive ideas are heading for even the ones on your site. Beside I do know how to present an argument without disrespecting others and myself. I present my idea clear and confidently like you have so I know that you know what I am talking about. I am going to re-examine your idea and tell you what I think because it was very interesting to me and it overlapped with my own in some ways. I just want to review it one more time and get back to you In the mean time you can also review mine and tell me what you think of it. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 6 Nov 2009 16:14 Hy this is Conrad J Countess It amazes me that grown people studying such a prestigious subject as physics, which is to some, the highest form of the search for the Undisputed Truth with Crystal Blue Persuasion, should act so childishly, turning the Google dialogs of physics, into the goo goo -ga ga, childish dialogs, and seriously compromising its and their own credibility. As one of the few vehicles upon which some of us can test, polish, and publish our ideas, I would think that it would be recognized for what it could truly be. It could very well be one of the only networks where naturally talented human beings, who have not been given the chance by the established physics community, who may very well be more interested in who is right, and gets credit and all the grants, speeches, and publishing money, that comes with it, than what is right. I am of the opinion that truth should be acknowledged, wherever it comes from. In my opinion, some of the best theory's have been posted on this site, even if they may be few and far between. And if we really want to be taken seriously, we should treat each other with respect and perhaps even prepare a press release for some of the theory's. Why not? If everyone out there is serious about their work, why not vote on some of these ideas and present them to the press for publication, sort of what you all have done on the site that your page is posted on? This would make us more consciouses of what we say to each other, how we say it, and spur us to probably do our best work, especially if we know that the world will review this. I know my idea is ready to be put up against any in the world, especially after what I have seen on these sites. Now dont get me wrong, I acknowledged that there are good ideas here and across the web, I just think that mine is amongst the most revolutionary, and the one that most other analogically, logically, mathematical, and statistically, sound, and a =n idea that all the other progressive ideas are heading for even the ones on your site. Beside I do know how to present an argument without disrespecting others and myself. I present my idea clear and confidently like you have so I know that you know what I am talking about. I am going to re-examine your idea and tell you what I think because it was very interesting to me and it overlapped with my own in some ways. I just want to review it one more time and get back to you In the mean time you can also review mine and tell me what you think of it. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 6 Nov 2009 20:23 Hy this is Conrad J Countess It amazes me that grown people studying such a prestigious subject as physics, which is to some, the highest form of the search for the Undisputed Truth with Crystal Blue Persuasion, should act so childishly, turning the Google dialogs of physics, into the goo goo -ga ga, childish dialogs, and seriously compromising its and their own credibility. As one of the few vehicles upon which some of us can test, polish, and publish our ideas, I would think that it would be recognized for what it could truly be. It could very well be one of the only networks where naturally talented human beings, who have not been given the chance by the established physics community, who may very well be more interested in who is right, and gets credit and all the grants, speeches, and publishing money, that comes with it, than what is right. I am of the opinion that truth should be acknowledged, wherever it comes from. In my opinion, some of the best theory's have been posted on this site, even if they may be few and far between. And if we really want to be taken seriously, we should treat each other with respect and perhaps even prepare a press release for some of the theory's. Why not? If everyone out there is serious about their work, why not vote on some of these ideas and present them to the press for publication, sort of what you all have done on the site that your page is posted on? This would make us more consciouses of what we say to each other, how we say it, and spur us to probably do our best work, especially if we know that the world will review this. I know my idea is ready to be put up against any in the world, especially after what I have seen on these sites. Now dont get me wrong, I acknowledged that there are good ideas here and across the web, I just think that mine is amongst the most revolutionary, and the one that is the most analogically, logically, mathematical, geometrical, and statistically, sound, and an idea that all the other progressive ideas are converging toward, even the ones on your site. Besides I do know how to present an argument without disrespecting others and myself. I present my idea clear and confidently like you have so I know that you know what I am talking about. I am going to re-examine your idea and tell you what I think because it was very interesting to me and it overlapped with my own in some ways. I just want to review it one more time and get back to you In the mean time you can also review mine and tell me what you think of it. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 6 Nov 2009 20:36 Sorry for the redundant post, but they did not register when I first attempted them. So I tried repetedly, and then they all appeared at once. Oh well, maybe it was worth repeating, and warrented being said more than once. THE WEB IS INTELLEGENT!!! Conrad Countess
From: Inertial on 6 Nov 2009 20:40
"cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:23ec126d-c522-470e-8da3-1b4015194b83(a)t2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > Sorry for the redundant post, but they did not register when I first > attempted them. So I tried repetedly, and then they all appeared at > once. Oh well, maybe it was worth repeating, and warrented being said > more than once. > > THE WEB IS INTELLEGENT!!! A lot of the posts here would suggest otherwise :):) |