photography documentaries
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jun 2010 02:22 sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> > But you're only prepared to share other peoples information and >> > intellectual >> > property you never share your own, probably because it's worthless, but as >> > yet I've not seen you share your bank details or anything of any use >> > unless >> > it comes from someone else. >> >I also share my own information.. I have many pictures and videos >> >online >> >> Where ? > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/thcganja/ And what's under each photo? "Some rights reserved" Hypocrite. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jun 2010 02:22 sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 21 jun, 17:31, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:eeb20c84-5ae8-4015-a2c8-f473a0239d4c(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... >> >> >I never take anything as my own. I just share information with others >> >as I see fit and engaging in this activity is simply a matter of >> >exercising a basic human right. >> >> Why is it you never share information that you have created, and what if >> someone else puts up your information without your permission ? >> Do you think it's still yours or does it belong to everyone ? >> > >You should learn to quote properly. I regularly share information I >have created and >if someone else shares my information with other people who collect >information, that's >just fine because it's a human right to share and exchange >information. Is that why this is under photoos you claim are yours? "Some rights reserved" -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: sobriquet on 23 Jun 2010 05:59 On 23 jun, 08:22, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> > But you're only prepared to share other peoples information and > >> > intellectual > >> > property you never share your own, probably because it's worthless, but as > >> > yet I've not seen you share your bank details or anything of any use > >> > unless > >> > it comes from someone else. > >> >I also share my own information.. I have many pictures and videos > >> >online > > >> Where ? > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/thcganja/ > > And what's under each photo? > > "Some rights reserved" > > Hypocrite. You simply can't put your pictures on flickr with "No rights reserved". > > -- > Ray Fischer > rfisc...(a)sonic.net
From: sobriquet on 23 Jun 2010 06:01 On 23 jun, 08:22, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On 21 jun, 17:31, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:eeb20c84-5ae8-4015-a2c8-f473a0239d4c(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com.... > > >> >I never take anything as my own. I just share information with others > >> >as I see fit and engaging in this activity is simply a matter of > >> >exercising a basic human right. > > >> Why is it you never share information that you have created, and what if > >> someone else puts up your information without your permission ? > >> Do you think it's still yours or does it belong to everyone ? > > >You should learn to quote properly. I regularly share information I > >have created and > >if someone else shares my information with other people who collect > >information, that's > >just fine because it's a human right to share and exchange > >information. > > Is that why this is under photoos you claim are yours? > > "Some rights reserved" > > -- > Ray Fischer > rfisc...(a)sonic.net Well that could mean anything, like perhaps I don't want others to share my pictures and claim they are their own pictures. I don't share photography documentaries from others claiming I've made them myself.
From: whisky-dave on 23 Jun 2010 08:49
"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:52c66482-d7a9-47a1-9282-37e4ef1bc97e(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... > On 22 jun, 14:22, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:92b0cbc2-a741-415d-b101-a6bd5a10e74f(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... >> >> >Kind of ironic to hear a nazi cockroach like you lecturing others on >> >how to recognize someone with nazi sympathies. >> >> How do you recognise a Nazi cockroach do they have swastikas on their >> back ? > > No, you recognize them by the way they advocate human rights > violations. You mean as you see them or as they actually are. >> >> How about the human right to keep your information private > > Well, nobody is arguing that everybody must disclose all their > information, But yuo said all information belongs in the public domain. >but once they publish > their information, You 'publish' your information when you use your credit card don't you. And what if someone else publishes your information without your permission. But then again only a Nazi cockroach would stop information that's been published from being shared, would you object to your bank details being shared ? Now who's the Nazi cockroach. > An artist can't sell a painting and dictate to the new owner that it's > not allowed to hang the painting > in front of a window where people from the outside are able to enjoy > it as well. No one has ever said that A strawman is what you're refering to. >> how about your right to tell a person a secret but not to have someone >> else >> blurt it out to everyone else in the world. > > That's not a right. It's not like you can tell a secret to random > people with the remark that they > are not allowed to share that information with others and expecting > them not to share that information > with others. Why not ? doctors are suposed to be confidental > If you share a secret with someone, you can only expect > them to keep it a secret when > you know that person to some degree so you can judge whether or not > they will keep your information > to themselves or share it with others. So that's confidentiality in > the context of an interpersonal relationship. yep, but what if someone stole that information and then gave it to someone else. > >> Would you really want your doctor to tell the world of your problem(s). >> Some we all know about but what of the others. > > That would be fine with me. But that's all besides the point. People > who create stuff usually don't intend > their creations to remain confidential, they just mistakenly > presuppose that they get to dictate the terms and conditions under > which people are allowed to access their creative output. Yes and that's why there are laws to protect those people that actually do soemthing worthwhile unlike some others. |