photography documentaries
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: sobriquet on 21 Jun 2010 11:49 On 21 jun, 17:18, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > On 2010-06-21 06:50:52 -0700, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> said: > > > > > > > > > "tony cooper" <tony_cooper...(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > >news:q51t16hnlr6l8e7nnp3gohv65g9bm9ejh2(a)4ax.com... > >> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:35:06 -0500, Die Wahrheit > >> <diewahrh...(a)somewherehonest.net> wrote: > > >>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:05:11 -0700, Savageduck > >>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > > >>>> On 2010-06-19 20:44:22 -0700, tony cooper <tony_cooper...(a)earthlink.net> > >>>> said: > > >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:14:21 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet > >>>>> <dohduh...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> Just because people have a swastika on display, that doesn't imply > >>>>>> they subscribe to the tenets of the national socialist workers party > >>>>>> in former Nazi Germany. > > >>>>> If anyone knows, the Duck knows that if it walks like a duck and > >>>>> quacks like a duck that it's probably a duck. > > >>>> I haven't seen many Aryan Brotherhood, NLR, Sacramaniac, SkinHead, > >>>> White Power, or Peckerwood gang members sporting "Buddhist or Hindu > >>>> swastika" tattoos or decorating their walls with anything other than > >>>> those we became familiar with since the rise of the NDAP after WWI. > >>>> Finding a swastika on, or about a subject gives most investigators a > >>>> pretty good idea of that individual's mindset and philosophy. > > >>> Interesting you should say that. I once visited the St. Paul cathedral. > > >> Which St Paul's? > > >> If the one in London, Christopher Wren did not anticipate the swastika > >> design being a symbol of the Nazis hundreds of years later. > > > The swastika sysmbol is 1000s of years old I thought the earlist was record > > being about 9000 BC. > > It's also a Hindi symbol as was used in India centuries before Germany used > > it. > > The point of this side discussion the thread was, with regard to the > contemporary context of swastika display post WWI, whether on a wall, > or as a tattoo is is the notoriety it gained as a symbol of the NSDAP, > or nazi party. > 99.9% of those wearing such tattoos, or displaying swastikas on their > bedroom, or living room walls are usually racist, violent, mostly white > supremacist, wannabe nazis, admirers of the policies of that teutonic > group. > They are for the most part ignorant of any other origins of the symbol > found in Hindu, Buddhist, Native-American, or other use before 1919. > Today the swastika displayed in a pre-1919 cathedral, Hindu, or > Buddhist temple, or post WWII museum is understood in historic context. > So today an obviously antisocial individual, openly displaying a > swastika on skin, or an a bedroom wall, is likely to be doing that > because of nazi association, rather than an interest in earlier > historic origins. Certainly that display is a free speech issue, and It > tells us quite a lot about those individuals. > > BTW; Hindi is a language, not to be confused with Hindu, which is the > religious philosophy, they are not the same thing. > > -- > Regards, > > Savageduck Kind of ironic to hear a nazi cockroach like you lecturing others on how to recognize someone with nazi sympathies. Your feeble attempts to demonize others are not very effective though, because right from the start I've been advocating universal human rights and people with nazi sympathies usually are not too keen on the idea of human rights, because it is incompatible with their idea of racial supremacy and the freedom of the government to arbitrarily restrict the freedom of individuals.
From: John McWilliams on 21 Jun 2010 11:52 sobriquet wrote: > > You should learn to quote properly. I regularly share information I > have created and You should learn to set your line wrap properly. -- lsmft
From: Tim Conway on 21 Jun 2010 11:54 "sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3e971ce7-d077-4836-9272-ff55dd832de3(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > On 21 jun, 17:02, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:897490ea-7977-4a15-9f13-5a41b0b9e9a3(a)z8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... >> >> >Ah ok, so in order to enjoy intellectual property rights, I must >> >submit my creations to some kind of commission that is going to assess >> >the intellectual value of my creative output in order to evaluate >> >whether or not I can enjoy the protection of intellectual property >> >laws? >> >> No not really, if your intellectualism is worth copying then they'll be >> people out their trying to copy it and that's when you need I.P laws to >> protect you. Until you have done such a thing you won't require >> protection >> any more than a catholic priest will require protection from getting a >> choir >> boy pregnant. >> >> I've seen nothing that you have created that is worth protecting to date. > > People read and reply to my usenet postings, so apparently they are > interested in using my creative output. If nobody was replying to my > usenet postings, you might have a point. > >> >> >So, where do I submit my creative output in order to guarantee my >> >rights? >> >> First you have to output something creative that someone actually wants. >> 10011001111 isn't exactly in great demand > > Some of my pictures have received over 20.000 views. > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/thcganja/416926364/ > > So there does seem to be some interest in my creative output. I think they're more interested in seeing your stash.
From: sobriquet on 21 Jun 2010 12:33 On 21 jun, 17:52, John McWilliams <jp...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > sobriquet wrote: > > > You should learn to quote properly. I regularly share information I > > have created and > > You should learn to set your line wrap properly. > > -- > lsmft I can't specify any line wrap settings in the groups.google usenet interface.
From: John McWilliams on 21 Jun 2010 12:56
sobriquet wrote: > On 21 jun, 17:52, John McWilliams <jp...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> sobriquet wrote: >> >>> You should learn to quote properly. I regularly share information I >>> have created and >> You should learn to set your line wrap properly. >> >> -- >> lsmft > > I can't specify any line wrap settings in the groups.google usenet > interface. Don't use Google, for that and ten other reasons, one of which is your mission will be read by fewer people. -- john mcwilliams |