From: Scott M. on
You realise that in your response, you baiscally made my point, right?

-Scott

"Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message
news:ujpqBNyRKHA.220(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> news:OQHQyLtRKHA.1792(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>>> You can disagree all you want, Scotty. Whether you agree or not means
>>> nothing to me because you are a not important and your presence here is
>>> not required. Mike
>>
>> Great. Now that we both agree we could care less about each other,
>> maybe you'll stop posting rants at me.
>
> That wasn't a rant, Scotty. It was a pefectly rational response to your
> own irrational statement.
>
> Mike
>
>


From: Scott M. on
Karl, you've got way too much time on your hands and I really don't see the
need to feed the trolls any longer.

-Scott

"Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message
news:uIaGbWtRKHA.1280(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Scott M. wrote:
>> "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote ...
>>
>>>> You disagree that "Call" originated with classic VB?
>>>
>>> Ever hear of Fortran? ASM?
>>
>> Sure I have, but since those languages are not VB, they are not related
>> to
>> my response. No one is asking about the use of Call in those languages.
>> I'm talking about when Call originated in the VB language.
>
> Well forgive me for taking you to mean what you said, in that case. Call
> certainly did *not* originate with ClassicVB. But if upon correction and
> reflection you want to qualify your initial WILD ASSertion, so be it.
>
> VB is a dialect of MS BASIC, and Call goes back further than VB in that
> language family. It's entirely debatable whether VFred falls into the
> same family, so don't bother pointing out the confusingly similar names as
> any sort of rationale for that meaningless restriction.
> --
> .NET: It's About Trust!
> http://vfred.mvps.org
>


From: Scott M. on
What I find really telling is that there has been absolutely NO advocation
of .NET in this thread. There has been no evangelism about it whatsoever.
What is being discussed is simply the use a particular keyword in it. Yet,
the "usual suspects" have climbed up on their holier than thou horese and
started with the usual ranting and raving about how bad it is that .NET is
being evangelized and advocated here.

Best I can tell, these folks know how to write, but just not how to read.

-Scott


"Dave O." <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:OIax6C2RKHA.5108(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
> "mayayana" <mayaXXyana(a)rcXXn.com> wrote in message
> news:O9TnCy1RKHA.764(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> What does all this mean? Is it some sort of
>> .Net syndrome? Mad Net Disease? Or maybe .Net
>> is like the Mormons: You have to go out and evangelize
>> for a period of time?
>
> You know what, I reckon that subconsciously they need to convince
> themselves that .NET is worth the time and effort they've put into it.
> They must realize that no amount of evangelizing is going to convince the
> overwhelming majority of VB6 users to move to .NET, if these VB6 users
> were going to jump that way we'd have done it ages ago. They must also
> realize that one language is not intrinsically "better" than another, it's
> "horses for courses", they might find .NET does what they need and good
> luck to them if it's so. I just wish they would go away and leave this NG
> alone.
>
>
>
> Dave O.
>
>


From: Karl E. Peterson on
Scott M. wrote:
> Karl, you've got way too much time on your hands

Apologetic concession accepted. :-P
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org


From: Karl E. Peterson on
Scott M. wrote:
> , but rather it is something that is actively discouraged
> (along with all the other legacy VB stuff).

Right, the two languages are similar enough to be extremely dangerous! Best forget
all thoughts of ever having been productive, so that one may properly assume the
position at the master's will. Got it.
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Prev: crack for VSFlex8 in VB6.0
Next: Component Handles