From: Me on
On 1/06/2010 4:48 p.m., John McWilliams wrote:
> Me wrote:
>> On 1/06/2010 12:48 p.m., Rich wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, I remember worthless, paper companies in the 1990's worth more in
>>> the stock market than GE because had high-tech names and that impressed
>>> morons. F--- Apple.
>>>
>> You can't seriously compare Apple, with revenue of ~$40 billion,
>> income (EBIT) of $11 billion, and profit of ~$8 billion with
>> tech-bubble startups of the late '90s?
>
> Rich can use his hatred of Apple, compact cameras, plastic and people
> unlike him ethnically to make any "comparison" you can think of.
>
> Maybe he shorted the stock at $40....
>
He might just be an unhappy malcontent needing Prozac...
Oh wait, Prozac only "works" (self-reported) in about 70% of cases.
What he /really/ needs is a new iPhone:
http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/05/30/iphone_college_students/index.html
"72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier."
Better than Prozac.
From: Rich on
Me <user(a)domain.invalid> wrote in news:hu2646$8u3$1(a)news.albasani.net:

> On 1/06/2010 4:48 p.m., John McWilliams wrote:
>> Me wrote:
>>> On 1/06/2010 12:48 p.m., Rich wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I remember worthless, paper companies in the 1990's worth
>>>> more in the stock market than GE because had high-tech names and
>>>> that impressed morons. F--- Apple.
>>>>
>>> You can't seriously compare Apple, with revenue of ~$40 billion,
>>> income (EBIT) of $11 billion, and profit of ~$8 billion with
>>> tech-bubble startups of the late '90s?
>>
>> Rich can use his hatred of Apple, compact cameras, plastic and people
>> unlike him ethnically to make any "comparison" you can think of.
>>
>> Maybe he shorted the stock at $40....
>>
> He might just be an unhappy malcontent needing Prozac...
> Oh wait, Prozac only "works" (self-reported) in about 70% of cases.
> What he /really/ needs is a new iPhone:
> http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/05/30/iphone_college_students/in
> dex.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier."
> Better than Prozac.
>

72% have IQ's under 95...
From: Mike Russell on

> On 2010-06-01 18:39:41 -0700, Rich <none(a)nowhere.com> said:
>> 72% have IQ's under 95...

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:03:00 -0700, Savageduck wrote:
> ...and you know that little fact, how?

It's part of the definition of IQ.
http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQBasics.aspx
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
From: Twibil on
On Jun 1, 6:39 pm, Rich <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
> > dex.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier."
> > Better than Prozac.
>
> 72% have IQ's under 95...

Yup.

But alas for you they're not the same 72%.
From: Peter Irwin on
Twibil <nowayjose6(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 6:39?pm, Rich <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > dex.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier."
>> > Better than Prozac.
>>
>> 72% have IQ's under 95...
>
> Yup.

That can't be right. IQ scores ideally have a mean of 100 and
a standard deviation of 15. So the score that 72% of people
score less than should be a little more than one sigma above 100.

Peter.