New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 31 Jul 2006 22:38 On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:25:11 -0500, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> >>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That >>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is >>> defending. >> >>Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* ! >> >>I'm defending the rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to forget about when >>it suits you. > >--- >Extraordinary measures are called for during times of war. That word is too big for him.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 31 Jul 2006 22:43 Eeyore wrote: > > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > > > America believes in the *principle* of an armed civil militia. What's so wrong with applying > > > that principle elsewhere ? > > > > > > Graham > > > > Now you are changing the subject. > > Not at all. > > > Support implies providing arms, food, fuel and other weapons. > > Where did I say anything about support ? > > Graham How about in your own words? "Hezbollah is a militia too of course too. You Americans should *support* it !" -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Phat Bytestard on 31 Jul 2006 22:41 On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:35:48 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com> Gave us: >On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:24:13 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax ><dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>Jim Thompson wrote: >[snip] >>> >>> Such heroes they'll be when Israel brings out MOAB ;-) >> >>"Bring em on!" >>Now, where have I heard that one before? >> >>And how can Israel militarily defeat an organisation as nebulous as >>Hezbollah? Are they going to kill every Lebanese supporter? From the air? > >Yep. > >> >>And what are they going to do when their soldiers are *not* handed back >>unilaterally? >> >>Dirk > >You're naive. They're already dead. > Sadly, that is likely so.
From: Phat Bytestard on 31 Jul 2006 22:42 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:42:02 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Jim Thompson wrote: > >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:09:35 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> > >> [snip] >> >> >> >> More proof that you are insane. :( >> > >> >More proof that you're two-faced. >> > >> >If a well-regulated militia is good for America why shouldn't it be good elsewhere ? >> > >> >Graham >> >> Show us the "well-regulated". They're thugs. >> >> ...Jim Thompson > >They're far better regulated than your backwoods hicks. Like I said. You don't even know what the word means. > >In any case didn't J.L. say regulated meant armed in this context ? You're an idiot.
From: Eeyore on 31 Jul 2006 22:43
Jim Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:22:08 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Jim Thompson wrote: > > >> Please cite the "rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to > >> forget". > > > >The ones about torture ? > >http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR511202006 > > > >On 29 June 2006 the US Supreme Court ruled by a 5-3 majority that the structure > >and procedures of the military commissions as defined under President George W. > >Bushs Military Order of 13 November 2001 violated US military law and the > >Geneva Conventions > > > >Graham > > But there was NO *torture* found by any investigators or > Democrat-biased Congressmen. Because the USA chose to redefine torture. > You prove yet again that you are nothing but a BlatherMouth ;-) > > ...Jim Thompson You absymal ignorance of the Geneva Convention is as deep as the oceans. You are a clown with a big red nose and giant floppy shoes and spiky orange hair. You are a righturd clown with 40 other righturd clowns all honking your horns and running around in circles for the amusement of the crowd. anon. Graham |